Teams

CCP HLUCHAN (Blue)

2026 FW Men 55 & Over Winter · FT WORTH 9.0 MEN 55

8 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-13vs CCP HLUCHANSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichael Kelly / Thomas Rech vs Andy Alexander / JD Miles2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJuan Sanchez / Matt Duncan vs Taylor Foreman / Brandon Becicka7-5, 6-2
2026-04-09vs CCP HLUCHANWon 20
W#1 DoublesVictor Munoz / Terry Traylor vs Brian Booth / Wally Devereaux6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatt Duncan / Yoshitaka Yukawa vs Scott Howell / James Cole6-1, 7-5
2026-03-31vs CCP HLUCHANSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJames Cole / Steven Hluchan vs Travis Satterfield / Thomas Rech6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJuan Sanchez / Matt Duncan vs Justin Huffman / Daniel Beres2-6, 0-6
2026-03-24vs CCP HLUCHANLost 02
L#1 DoublesVictor Munoz / Thomas Rech vs Andy Alexander / Bradley Tidwell6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJuan Sanchez / Matt Duncan vs Daniel Beres / Brandon Becicka2-6, 6-7
2026-03-19vs CCP HLUCHANLost 02
L#1 DoublesVictor Munoz / Matt Duncan vs Bradley Tidwell / Andy Alexander6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTravis Satterfield / Yoshitaka Yukawa vs Justin Huffman / Taylor Foreman4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · FT WORTH 9.0 MEN 55
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CCP HLUCHAN41123880
2CCP HLUCHAN (Blue)1431225164

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Terry Traylor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.21
Thomas Rech
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.11
Matt Duncan
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
4.10
Steven Hluchan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.99
Victor Munoz
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.92
Yoshitaka Yukawa
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.45
Travis Satterfield
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Juan Sanchez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yoshitaka Yukawa + Matt Duncan303 matchesnot enough data
Matt Duncan + Juan Sanchez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Terry Traylor
18W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%84%16%
4.37
Thomas Rech
5W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
4.21
Matt Duncan
30W–27L career · 7 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
4.11
Steven Hluchan
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
4.10
Victor Munoz
17W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.99
Yoshitaka Yukawa
25W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.92
Travis Satterfield
5W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.45
Juan Sanchez
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.