Teams

3-HRoss-ENO

2023 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 4.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-18vs 4-LStraube-Eno-Singles-18 4.0Won 20
W#1 SinglesValerie Acre vs Dayna Kelly6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesJustyne Ross vs Hannah White6-0, 6-0
2023-07-13vs 5-CCouto-HRWon 21
W#1 SinglesValerie Acre vs Carrie Couto6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJustyne Ross vs Mary Feger2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesAnna Tomkins vs Atsuko Duncan6-2, 6-1
2023-07-06vs 1-ELinnander-Singles-SVCWon 10
W#2 SinglesAnna Tomkins vs Blair Kelly6-0, 6-0
2023-06-27vs 2-KPollak-Eno-18+Won 10
W#2 SinglesLynsey Easley vs Kathryn Pollak6-4, 6-3
2023-06-13vs 4-LStraube-Eno-Singles-18 4.0Won 20
W#1 SinglesJustyne Ross vs Hillary Mulder5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 SinglesLynsey Easley vs Tammy Chin6-2, 6-1
2023-06-09vs 1-ELinnander-Singles-SVCWon 10
W#1 SinglesAnna Tomkins vs Eve Hammett6-0, 6-0
2023-05-23vs 2-KPollak-Eno-18+Won 10
W#2 SinglesJustyne Ross vs Kathryn Pollak5-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Anna Tomkins
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4.5
3.98
Valerie Acre
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.85
Lynsey Easley
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.79
Justyne Ross
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.79
Meghan Howard
published
3.71
Heidi Ross
published 4
3.61
Elizabeth Heald
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justyne Ross + Valerie Acre12353% games+1.7% vs expected
Heidi Ross + Lynsey Easley13555% games+1.2% vs expected
Lynsey Easley + Justyne Ross404 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Ross + Justyne Ross213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anna Tomkins
352W–48L career · 6 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
4.21
4
Valerie Acre
131W–57L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Lynsey Easley
132W–79L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Justyne Ross
145W–117L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
Meghan Howard
42W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Heidi Ross
55W–38L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Elizabeth Heald
16W–10L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.