Teams

Sandy Springs (Jennifer Feldman)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.5 Women (Michelle Wilkinson)

18 players · average NTRP 4.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-23vs Sugar Creek (Dannita Stanley)*Won 41
W#1 DoublesBrandi Cheeley / Kathy von Broembsen vs Cee Jai Jones / Micki Harris6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesGrace Pietkiewicz vs Yvonne Hospedales6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Feldman / Hannah Grossman vs Dannita Stanley / Nozipho Lewis6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesWhitley Carter / Michelle Edler vs Sarah Witherspoon / Leteaser Koita7-5, 6-2
L#4 DoublesTracy Collins / Laney Sneed vs Julia Bolden / Tara McGowan2-6, 6-7
2024-11-16vs Sandy Springs (Katelyn Peterson)*Lost 23
L#1 DoublesLaura Baker / Lexie Elwell vs Kelsey O'Regan / Tracey Yang6-7, 6-0, 5-7
W#1 SinglesGrace Pietkiewicz vs Alia Bailey6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrandi Cheeley / Kathy von Broembsen vs Kim Carducci / Bailey McDaniel7-6, 4-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Feldman / Virginia Parler vs Maria Stand / Asbel Giang3-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesBrooke Hilyer / Sally Robertson vs Chiara Cavaggion / Michelle Swiec6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women (Michelle Wilkinson) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.30 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.57
Lexie Elwell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.50
Kathy von Broembsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.46
Jacqueline Hall
published 4.5
4.40
Grace Pietkiewicz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.33
Brandi Cheeley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.32
Elizabeth Wendel
published 4.5
4.30
Virginia Parler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.26
Kristie Teoh
published
4.25
Hannah Grossman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Whitley Carter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.23
Sally Robertson
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
4.22
Jennifer Feldman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.18
Michelle Edler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.18
Laney Sneed
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
4.11
Brooke Hilyer
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Laura Baker
published
Naveena Sekaran
published
Tracy Collins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy von Broembsen + Michelle Edler5260% games+5.8% vs expected
Kathy von Broembsen + Brandi Cheeley6257% games−5.8% vs expected
Jennifer Feldman + Virginia Parler3251% games−9.6% vs expected
Kathy von Broembsen + Virginia Parler213 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Feldman + Jacqueline Hall213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lexie Elwell
15W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%29%71%
4.57
Kathy von Broembsen
36W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.50
4.5
Jacqueline Hall
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
4.46
4.5
Grace Pietkiewicz
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
4.40
4.5
Brandi Cheeley
25W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
4.33
4.5
Elizabeth Wendel
14W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
4.32
Virginia Parler
14W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
4.30
Kristie Teoh
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Hannah Grossman
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
Whitley Carter
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
Sally Robertson
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
Jennifer Feldman
50W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.22
Michelle Edler
14W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
4.18
Laney Sneed
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Brooke Hilyer
34W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.11
Laura Baker
25W–21L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Naveena Sekaran
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracy Collins
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.