Teams

Wickertree

2025 FALL A40&O · 40&O 3.0W Monday

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-01-15vs The Players ClubWon 21
W#1 DoublesClaudia Hoet / Jaimee Hoy vs Stacy McIntire / Natalie Knezevic1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHolly Cush vs Jen Reis6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBridget Shoemaker / Jenni Kneuertz vs Metta McCoy / Michelle Boudoulas6-4, 6-2
2025-01-13vs Olympic 2Lost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Thomas / Tyler Nunemaker vs Annelies Condon / Heather Pliskin6-7, 3-5
2024-12-16vs Racquet Club 2Lost 23
W#1 DoublesJaimee Hoy / Jenni Kneuertz vs Nicole Walter / Ann Humphreys6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesEniko Jovanovic vs Yumi Willard3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesClaudia Hoet / Amy DeRose vs Stephanie Bisca / Cindi Haney3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesHolly Cush vs Lena Furci7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBridget Shoemaker / Amber Dyer vs Tara Gittins / Angela Lanctot2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-12-09vs Elysium 2Lost 23
W#1 DoublesLibby Seeley / Jennifer Minadeo vs Shelley Walter / Suzanne Smith6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesHolly Cush vs Munnal Idris1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesClaudia Hoet / Eniko Jovanovic vs Tricia Shinnick / Wendy Stohr6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJenni Kneuertz vs Laura Factor5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSusan Busch / TINA JACOBY vs Jennifer Houser / Debbie Lucas3-6, 4-6
2024-12-09vs The Players ClubLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristina Kulesa / Tyler Nunemaker vs Caroline Reinke / Roxsann Wilson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-12-02vs Elysium 1Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChristina Kulesa / Tyler Nunemaker vs Melinda Kane / Kim Keys4-6, 5-7
2024-11-25vs OlympicWon 41
W#1 DoublesTyler Nunemaker / Janet Grimm vs Robbin Northrop / Sarah Longhouse6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesErika Jones vs Annelies Condon2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJaimee Hoy / Jenni Kneuertz vs Arica Worth / Jill Hadley6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesEniko Jovanovic vs Traci Zavarella7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAmy DeRose / Claudia Hoet vs Rachel Vranich / Abigail Shaw6-4, 5-3
2024-11-18vs Racquet Club 1Lost 23
W#1 DoublesJanet Grimm / Tyler Nunemaker vs Michelle Koffel / Nadia Malik6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSisilia Cheung vs Megan Maas3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Minadeo / Libby Seeley vs Cameron Smith / Carrie Stieg6-0, 7-5
L#2 SinglesErika Jones vs Joy Pardi1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJaimee Hoy / Midge Taylor vs Alex Texler / Paige Wood4-6, 2-6
2024-11-11vs Elysium 1Lost 23
W#1 DoublesTyler Nunemaker / Janet Grimm vs Susan Grunert / Toni Block6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesTINA JACOBY vs Qing Radebaugh2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMidge Taylor / Jennifer Minadeo vs Kelly Ackert / Carrie Tarrant4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesErika Jones vs Jill Cullinan7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesEniko Jovanovic / Bridget Shoemaker vs Debbie Korcykoski / Cynthia Humphry2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40&O 3.0W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Janet Grimm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Bridget Shoemaker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.03
Tyler Nunemaker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Jaimee Hoy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.96
Jenni Kneuertz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.96
Jennifer Minadeo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Eniko Jovanovic
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.83
Libby Seeley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Claudia Hoet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Amy DeRose
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Sisilia Cheung
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.68
Holly Cush
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.63
Midge Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.54
TINA JACOBY
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.45
Amber Dyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Erika Jones
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Susan Busch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tyler Nunemaker + Janet Grimm211061% games+8.5% vs expected
Eniko Jovanovic + Claudia Hoet12658% games+6.6% vs expected
Jenni Kneuertz + Jaimee Hoy17166% games+6.6% vs expected
Tyler Nunemaker + Claudia Hoet8067% games+6.3% vs expected
Eniko Jovanovic + Janet Grimm2347% games+4.8% vs expected
Jenni Kneuertz + Bridget Shoemaker13557% games+2.0% vs expected
Bridget Shoemaker + Jaimee Hoy8359% games+1.2% vs expected
Jennifer Minadeo + Amy DeRose16756% games+0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Grimm
64W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3
Bridget Shoemaker
68W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Tyler Nunemaker
102W–51L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Jaimee Hoy
56W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Jenni Kneuertz
78W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
Jennifer Minadeo
89W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Eniko Jovanovic
116W–127L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Libby Seeley
157W–89L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Claudia Hoet
54W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Amy DeRose
71W–72L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sisilia Cheung
60W–89L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Holly Cush
54W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.68
Midge Taylor
127W–128L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
TINA JACOBY
43W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
3
Amber Dyer
43W–112L career · 1 line in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45
Erika Jones
13W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Busch
86W–44L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.