Teams

LA - High Strung

2025 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 2.5

10 players · average NTRP 2.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-12-07vs WC LA - Double the FunLost 03
L#1 DoublesNicole Sperling / Karen Silver vs Meredith Cruse / JoAnn Ishii7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristine Doryon / Karine Chung vs Amanda Lie / Liz Piotrowski0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Wexler / Mimi Swain vs Elizabeth Leiner / Berna Capo0-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesKarine Chung / Nicole Sperling vs Caroline Tran / Laurene Sandoval0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Wexler / Christine Doryon vs Brenda Pokorny / Homa Alamdari3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesApryl Huntzinger / Julie Quinn vs Le Trieu / Tina Lu2-6, 4-6
2025-10-04vs LA - Mulholland 2.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristine Doryon / Jennifer Wexler vs LeAnn Aharonian / Chi Kephart3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKarine Chung / Jennifer Lee vs Sara Gershfeld / Julie Tran2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRebecca Kim / Francette Kelley vs Frangelica Goulding / Hillary Lowe3-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Brett Bennett
published 3.5
2.75
Nicole Sperling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Karine Chung
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.44
Christine Doryon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.37
Jennifer Wexler
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.25
Karen Silver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Apryl Huntzinger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Francette Kelley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Mimi Swain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Kim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karine Chung + Jennifer Wexler5164% games+21.1% vs expected
Karine Chung + Christine Doryon10167% games+11.5% vs expected
Christine Doryon + Jennifer Wexler4355% games+5.6% vs expected
Jennifer Wexler + Karen Silver224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brett Bennett
67W–55L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Nicole Sperling
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
2.75
Karine Chung
21W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%40%60%
2.53
2.5
Christine Doryon
21W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%68%32%
2.44
Jennifer Wexler
18W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.37
Karen Silver
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Apryl Huntzinger
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Francette Kelley
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mimi Swain
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Kim
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.