Teams

Holt, Robbie

2026 Adult 40 & Over-JXN · Men 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-20vs Smith, NathanLost 13
L#1 DoublesWarren Biddle / Philip Cothern vs Kurt Black / Steven Patterson1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMarcello Gambino Meriles vs Joseph Presley0-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRandy Lominick / Jason Renkenberger vs Nathan Smith / Chad Feldman3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRobbie Holt / Forrest Gholston vs Mark Bradshaw / Jason Hampton6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2026-04-13vs Smith, NathanSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJason Sims / Jason Renkenberger vs Mark Bradshaw / Kevin Dotson1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMarcello Gambino Meriles vs Steven Patterson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobbie Holt / Forrest Gholston vs Joseph Presley / Kurt Black6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRandy Lominick / Suresh Alexander vs Jason Hampton / Darrell Harris6-4, 6-4
2026-04-06vs Smith, NathanWon 31
W#1 DoublesJason Renkenberger / Jason Sims vs Chad Feldman / Steven Patterson6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesDerrick Jones vs Nathan Smith6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesThomas Tynes / Ryan Engel vs Jeremy Hutto / Kurt Black2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesEric Walters / Marcello Gambino Meriles vs Mark Bradshaw / Darrell Harris6-4, 6-1
2026-03-30vs Smith, NathanSplit 22
L#1 DoublesWarren Biddle / Philip Cothern vs Mark Bradshaw / Nathan Smith7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMarcello Gambino Meriles vs Steven Patterson6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobbie Holt / Eric Walters vs Jeremy Hutto / Kurt Black2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesForrest Gholston / Thomas Tynes vs Darrell Harris / Jason Hampton5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-03-23vs Smith, NathanSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJason Renkenberger / Philip Cothern vs Chad Feldman / Jason Hampton6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesDerrick Jones vs Joseph Presley3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWarren Biddle / Suresh Alexander vs Seth Thompson / Kurt Black1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesThomas Tynes / Robbie Holt vs Darrell Harris / Steven Patterson2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-03-10vs Smith, NathanLost 13
L#1 DoublesJason Renkenberger / Warren Biddle vs Matt Ferrell / Kevin Dotson1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRandy Lominick vs Seth Thompson1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRyan Engel / Derrick Jones vs Jason Hampton / Matthew Reece5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesThomas Tynes / Robbie Holt vs Darrell Harris / Nathan Smith6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-03-02vs Smith, NathanLost 04
L#1 DoublesWarren Biddle / Ryan Engel vs Kevin Dotson / Matt Ferrell2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRobbie Holt vs Seth Thompson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEric Walters / Jason Sims vs Joseph Presley / Matthew Reece3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesForrest Gholston / Suresh Alexander vs Mark Bradshaw / Nathan Smith3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Jason Renkenberger
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
2.88
Philip Cothern
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Marcello Gambino Meriles
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.77
Derrick Jones
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.77
Suresh Alexander
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Thomas Tynes
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.68
Warren Biddle
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
2.61
Ryan Engel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Forrest Gholston
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.60
Robbie Holt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.47
Jason Sims
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.42
Aidan Topakoglu
published 3
2.34
Randy Lominick
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Philip Cothern + Jason Renkenberger3254% games+9.2% vs expected
Warren Biddle + Philip Cothern0631% games−18.4% vs expected
Robbie Holt + Thomas Tynes5343% gamesnot enough data
Warren Biddle + Jason Renkenberger033 matchesnot enough data
Aidan Topakoglu + Randy Lominick033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Renkenberger
31W–18L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.14
Philip Cothern
28W–32L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
2.88
Marcello Gambino Meriles
11W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Derrick Jones
9W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Suresh Alexander
11W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Thomas Tynes
10W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Warren Biddle
13W–26L career · 10 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Ryan Engel
6W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
Forrest Gholston
5W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
2.60
Robbie Holt
12W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.60
Jason Sims
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47
3
Aidan Topakoglu
2W–16L career · no lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.42
Randy Lominick
5W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.