Teams

Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks

2021 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 4.0W

14 players · average NTRP 3.80 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-12-16vs Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/HronekLost 02
L#2 Female DoublesAlice Moe / Faith Petersen vs Rosa McGuire / Maria Womack1-6, 1-6
L#3 Female DoublesLaura Nunnelly / Kim Persky vs Mandy Berg / Kalee King3-6, 2-4
2021-12-09vs Ivory Ridge-LangstonSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesLisa OBrien / Megan Rusconi vs Christine Neeleman / Lori Taylor7-6, 2-3, 0-1
W#1 Female SinglesFaith Petersen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-12-02vs Sports Mall-DowDell/LewisWon 21
W#1 Female DoublesAMy Huish / Faith Petersen vs Addison Zimmerman / Anji DowDell1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 Female DoublesJutien Page / Elaine Zuckerman vs Christine Fotheringham / Julie Cooley2-6, 1-6
W#3 Female DoublesLisa OBrien / Megan Rusconi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-11-18vs Salt Lake Tennis-AhrendWon 30
W#1 Female DoublesLaura Nunnelly / Kim Persky vs Debbie Hutton / Kathleen Sorenson4-6, 5-4, 1-0
W#2 Female DoublesDonna Gordon / Renae Brooks vs Angela Rasmussen / Lisa Ahrend7-5, 6-2
W#3 Female DoublesLisa OBrien / Megan Rusconi vs Cricket Rollins / Amy Cutting7-6, 3-2
2021-11-11vs Sunpro-Harlan/MortensenWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesSherree Greenhalgh / Renae Brooks vs Kelly Mortensen / Susan Christensen6-1, 6-2
2021-11-04vs Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/HronekWon 21
L#1 Female DoublesElaine Zuckerman / Cathy Mclevish vs Mandy Berg / Paige Coward4-6, 2-6
W#1 Female SinglesFaith Petersen vs Joanna Larsen6-2, 2-5, 1-0
W#3 Female DoublesSherree Greenhalgh / Renae Brooks vs Rina Benson / Nicole Mills2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 4.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sunpro-Blackhurst/Allen4219513167
2Ivory Ridge-Boren/Owens42141023203
3Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks4215923180
4Sports Mall-DowDell/Lewis42141023177
5Sports Mall-Johnson42121225190
6Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek42111329194
7Ivory Ridge-Langston33141023192
8RISE AC-Olsen33121227220
9Sunpro-Harlan/Mortensen2491533204
10Ace Athletics-MacDonald/Jones2481634228
11Salt Lake Tennis-Ahrend1581634225
12Sports Mall-Romney/Adamson1571735221

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Lauren Hawley
published
3.88
Faith Petersen
usually #1 Female Singles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
Jutien Page
published 4
3.60
Laura Nunnelly
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #3 Female Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
AMy Huish
published 4
3.44
Renae Brooks
usually #2 Female Doubles 67%, also #3 Female Doubles 33% · published 4
3.36
Sherree Greenhalgh
usually #3 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published 4
3.25
Cathy Mclevish
published 3.5
3.20
Alice Moe
published 3.5
3.20
Megan Rusconi
usually #3 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Elaine Zuckerman
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Kim Persky
published
Lisa OBrien
published
Tricia Mavrinac
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

AMy Huish + Jutien Page18855% games+2.9% vs expected
Megan Rusconi + Renae Brooks191847% games+2.6% vs expected
Cathy Mclevish + Megan Rusconi0941% games−0.5% vs expected
Sherree Greenhalgh + Renae Brooks345245% games−1.6% vs expected
Sherree Greenhalgh + Cathy Mclevish91642% games−2.4% vs expected
Megan Rusconi + Lisa OBrien264444% games−2.8% vs expected
Jutien Page + Alice Moe7844% games−3.6% vs expected
Sherree Greenhalgh + Megan Rusconi2445% games−5.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Hawley
122W–31L career · no lines in 2021
<1%55%45%
4.48
4
Faith Petersen
101W–83L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Jutien Page
86W–97L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Laura Nunnelly
47W–43L career · 2 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
AMy Huish
83W–62L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Renae Brooks
96W–131L career · 3 lines in 2021
68%32%<1%
3.44
4
Sherree Greenhalgh
90W–159L career · 2 lines in 2021
86%14%<1%
3.36
3.5
Cathy Mclevish
41W–84L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Alice Moe
69W–71L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Megan Rusconi
73W–128L career · 3 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Elaine Zuckerman
16W–55L career · 2 lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.13
Kim Persky
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa OBrien
30W–44L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tricia Mavrinac
14W–32L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.