Teams

Janiszewsk/META

2025 Combo 18 & over-META · 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.14 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-16vs Cox-Lovelace/METAWon 21
L#1 DoublesSarah LaGuardia / Eve Little Bradford vs Ju Mo / Ruth Jackson5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnita Jilton / Morgan Scott vs Jean Swindle / Kim Cartier6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLynne Little / Regan Jordan vs Margaret Wells / Madga Cox7-6, 6-1
2025-09-15vs Cox-Lovelace/METALost 12
L#1 DoublesLynne Little / Regan Jordan vs Madga Cox / Olivia Osborne4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnneke Self / Eve Little Bradford vs Ju Mo / Ruth Jackson4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBarb Janiszewski / Anita Jilton vs Christina Betancourt / Rachel Lovelace6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-13vs Cox-Lovelace/METAWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrittini Thacker / Lynne Little vs Ruth Jackson / Rachel Lovelace6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnita Jilton / Sarah LaGuardia vs Jean Swindle / Madga Cox6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRegan Jordan / Anneke Self vs Margaret Wells / Christina Betancourt6-0, 6-0
2025-09-11vs Cox-Lovelace/METAWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah LaGuardia / Eve Little Bradford vs Ju Mo / Mary Warner6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRaegan Goodson / Regan Jordan vs Rachel Lovelace / Madga Cox6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrittini Thacker / Anneke Self vs Kim Cartier / Jessica Alzamora6-0, 6-0
2025-08-30vs Cox-Lovelace/METAWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrittini Thacker / Lynne Little vs Madga Cox / Olivia Osborne3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnita Jilton / Morgan Scott vs Mary Warner / Margaret Wells6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBarb Janiszewski / Bettina Chirica vs Ruth Jackson / Christina Betancourt6-4, 6-4
2025-08-25vs Cox-Lovelace/METAWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnita Jilton / Holly Grammer vs Laura Reeves / Ju Mo4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBettina Chirica / Raegan Goodson vs Rachel Lovelace / Ruth Jackson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLynne Little / Anneke Self vs Jean Swindle / Kim Cartier6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Janiszewsk/META5113513128
2Cox-Lovelace/META1551329194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Sarah LaGuardia
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Brittini Thacker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Eve Little Bradford
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.14
Lynne Little
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.03
Anita Jilton
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.00
Regan Jordan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.99
Holly Grammer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Raegan Goodson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Anneke Self
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Bettina Chirica
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.59
Barb Janiszewski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynne Little + Eve Little Bradford9170% games+13.7% vs expected
Lynne Little + Sarah LaGuardia6354% games−0.1% vs expected
Sarah LaGuardia + Holly Grammer134 matchesnot enough data
Anita Jilton + Regan Jordan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah LaGuardia
18W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Brittini Thacker
19W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Eve Little Bradford
25W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.18
Lynne Little
36W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.14
3
Anita Jilton
36W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.03
Regan Jordan
20W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
3.5
Holly Grammer
14W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Raegan Goodson
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.95
3
Anneke Self
8W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Bettina Chirica
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Barb Janiszewski
13W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.