Teams

Smoot 4.0

2022 Coppermine Adult 40 & Over · Coppermine Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.92 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-07vs CrawleyLost 02
L#1 DoublesErik Jones / Scott Lamont vs Michael Green / Daniel Berland2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoshua Sadler / Daniel Mansfield vs Jonathan Rivera / James Ginty2-6, 2-6
2022-05-06vs CrawleyWon 10
W#2 DoublesDaniel Mansfield / Jagannath Surampudi vs Mark Muneses / Marcus Moore6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-30vs CrawleyLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Casey / Erik Jones vs Sean Der / David Trang2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJoshua Sadler / Scott Lamont vs Michael Green / Daniel Berland4-6, 3-6
2022-04-29vs CrawleyLost 01
L#2 DoublesJagannath Surampudi / Joshua Sadler vs DONALD CRAWLEY / Mark Muneses1-6, 0-6
2022-04-23vs CrawleyLost 01
L#1 DoublesLarry Wall / Jagannath Surampudi vs Sean Der / David Trang3-6, 2-6
2022-04-09vs CrawleySplit 11
L#2 DoublesJoshua Sadler / Jagannath Surampudi vs Michael Jarman / Ali Kart3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesNeil Jensen / Erik Jones vs DONALD CRAWLEY / KHOURY ZIAD6-4, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Coppermine Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
James Smoot
published 4.5
3.83
Daniel Mansfield
published 4
3.58
Erik Jones
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Joshua Sadler
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.45
Neil Jensen
published
3.38
George Lamont
published 4
3.38
Larry Wall
published
3.33
Jagannath Surampudi
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joshua Sadler + Jagannath Surampudi2342% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
James Smoot
262W–225L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
4.40
4
Daniel Mansfield
33W–20L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Erik Jones
23W–64L career · 3 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Joshua Sadler
126W–94L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
3.50
Neil Jensen
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.45
4
George Lamont
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
3.38
Larry Wall
20W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Jagannath Surampudi
296W–330L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.