Teams

Forest Lakes

2021 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over Women · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-09vs BHSC - HooverLost 01
L#3 DoublesLynette Sanford / Shauna Hogg vs Arlene Okun / Taylor Kelley6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2021-06-02vs BHS - Alley CatsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMary Manley / Lynette Sanford vs Jean Shipman / Melissa Collier5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBeth Kohler / Shauna Hogg vs Margaret Smith / Anita McGinty1-6, 2-6
2021-05-26vs BHSC - HapgoodLost 01
L#3 DoublesShauna Hogg / Judy Roy vs Mickie Flanigan / Jeanne Ward6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2021-05-19vs KeswickWon 10
W#2 DoublesLynette Sanford / Mary Manley vs Sharon Merrick / Janet Silvester6-4, 6-4
2021-05-12Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLynette Sanford / Amy Snearer vs Jean Wardell / Kayla Odom1-6, 5-7
2021-04-28vs KeswickWon 10
W#2 DoublesShauna Hogg / Lynette Sanford vs Amelia Black / Sharon Merrick6-2, 6-4
2021-04-21vs ACACLost 01
L#1 SinglesShauna Hogg vs Kelly Lindauer1-6, 1-6
2021-04-16vs BHSC - HapgoodLost 02
L#1 DoublesShauna Hogg / Christine Eagleson vs Amy Taggart / Pascale Hapgood3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Kohler / Lynette Sanford vs Abbie Oliver / Amanda Daniero1-6, 2-6
2021-04-14vs BHS - Alley CatsLost 02
L#1 SinglesLynette Sanford vs Courtney Heyward6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesShauna Hogg / Amy Snearer vs Ellen Ochs / Melissa Collier3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Stephanie Hall
published
2.90
Mary Manley
published
2.72
Lynette Sanford
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.69
Judy Roy
published
2.60
2.24
Shauna Hogg
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 2.5
2.06
Beth Kohler
published 2.5
Susan Peck
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynette Sanford + Shauna Hogg151054% games+2.8% vs expected
Lynette Sanford + Mary Manley224 matchesnot enough data
Christine Eagleson + Judy Roy033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Hall
14W–17L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Mary Manley
9W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Lynette Sanford
93W–90L career · 7 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.72
Judy Roy
3W–8L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.69
3
Christine Eagleson
0W–12L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
2.60
2.5
Shauna Hogg
41W–99L career · 7 lines in 2021
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Beth Kohler
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Susan Peck
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.