Teams

OD 3.5W MM Bramhall

2025 NEOTA One-Doubles Summer · NEOTA A18&O 3.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-02vs OD 3.5W BCC LurieWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarlina Bramhall / Ashley Frazier vs Caryn Friedman / Lauren Roth6-2, 6-1
2025-07-29vs OD 3.5W MV4 ZhangWon 10
W#1 DoublesCelia Reid / Ashley Frazier vs Patti Baucco / Lisa Bockhoff6-4, 6-3
2025-07-19vs OD 3.5W BR MorrowWon 10
W#1 DoublesAshley Frazier / Carlina Bramhall vs Traci Tsai / Sara Timken6-3, 6-4
2025-07-12vs OD 3.5W CSC GoldbergWon 10
W#1 DoublesCelia Reid / Ashley Frazier vs Erin Ryan / Emily Geier6-4, 6-2
2025-07-11vs OD 3.5W MV1 BradyWon 10
W#1 DoublesCelia Reid / Ashley Frazier vs Liza Brady / Maggie Brady7-5, 6-3
2025-06-17vs OD 3.5W BCC LurieWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarlina Bramhall / Sue Diemer vs Elissa Lurie / Nicole Pinkert1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-06-14vs OD 3.5W MV4 ZhangWon 10
W#1 DoublesAshley Frazier / Celia Reid vs Gwen Anderson / Christine Olenik6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA A18&O 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Ashley Frazier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Celia Reid
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Carlina Bramhall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Kin Mei
published
3.00
Sue Diemer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Celia Reid + Ashley Frazier9654% games+1.9% vs expected
Carlina Bramhall + Kin Mei71546% games+0.5% vs expected
Carlina Bramhall + Sue Diemer2341% games−13.2% vs expected
Carlina Bramhall + Ashley Frazier4157% gamesnot enough data
Kin Mei + Sue Diemer404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Frazier
98W–60L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Celia Reid
54W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Carlina Bramhall
103W–79L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
Kin Mei
94W–80L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Sue Diemer
26W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.