Teams

FK Bonano

2025 Marion Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.08 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-04vs Marion/UlbrichtLost 01
L#1 DoublesJessica Bonano / Nicole Millsaps vs Nicole DeBolt / Lisa Steed4-6, 2-6
2025-11-23vs Marion/UlbrichtLost 02
L#1 DoublesCaroline Murray / Mime Ichini-Lurie vs Lisa Steed / Christy Ulbricht4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCammie McLeod / Nicole Millsaps vs Eileen Lombardo / Cheryl Brent1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-11-21vs Marion/UlbrichtLost 01
L#1 DoublesMime Ichini-Lurie / Cammie McLeod vs Christy Ulbricht / Debby Watts3-6, 5-7
2025-11-07vs Marion/UlbrichtLost 02
L#2 DoublesDiana Royo / Madison Sagas vs Nicole DeBolt / Lisa Steed4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Miller / Cammie McLeod vs Eileen Lombardo / Cheryl Brent7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2025-10-24vs Marion/UlbrichtSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMime Ichini-Lurie / Cammie McLeod vs Tanner Watts / Amy Graham4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiana Royo / Madison Sagas vs Nicole DeBolt / Christy Ulbricht6-2, 6-2
2025-10-17vs Marion/UlbrichtSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCammie McLeod / Amanda Miller vs Christy Ulbricht / Tanner Watts6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCaroline Murray / Madison Sagas vs Eileen Lombardo / Amy Graham6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-10vs Marion/UlbrichtLost 01
L#1 DoublesMime Ichini-Lurie / Caroline Murray vs Christy Ulbricht / Tanner Watts4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cammie McLeod
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.02
Madison Sagas
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.98
Mime Ichini-Lurie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.97
Diana Royo
published 4
3.86
Jenny Neelands
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.80
Caroline Murray
published 4
3.69
Andrea Harden
published 4
3.66
Nicole Millsaps
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jessica Bonano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cammie McLeod + Mime Ichini-Lurie033 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Harden + Nicole Millsaps123 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Millsaps + Jenny Neelands303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cammie McLeod
56W–54L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Madison Sagas
47W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.02
Mime Ichini-Lurie
94W–72L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
4
Diana Royo
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Jenny Neelands
243W–94L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Caroline Murray
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Andrea Harden
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Nicole Millsaps
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.66
Jessica Bonano
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.