Teams

Deuce Baby

2024 Fall Slam Doubles · Women 3.0

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-07vs Volley GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesStaci Shafer / Marianna Geyer vs Elena Willging / Kathy Collins0-6, 4-6
2024-10-28vs CharWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarianna Geyer / Zenaida Camacho vs Deborah Cashion / Blair Scheepers6-2, 6-1
2024-10-22vs Volley GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesStaci Shafer / Zenaida Camacho vs Elena Willging / Kathy Collins1-6, 0-6
2024-10-19vs Comin in HotLost 01
L#1 DoublesStaci Shafer / Jennifer Mcmillan vs Karen Shokes / Shannon Fuller0-6, 3-6
2024-10-05vs Love TennisWon 10
W#1 DoublesZenaida Camacho / Ana Paula Schweitzer vs Darrelyn Cooper / MARTHA LORD6-0, 6-0
2024-09-04vs CharLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarianna Geyer / Jennifer Mcmillan vs Mollyrose Wright / Blair Scheepers4-6, 4-6
2024-08-24vs Comin in HotLost 01
L#1 DoublesStaci Shafer / Ana Paula Schweitzer vs Karen Shokes / Shannon Fuller5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Ana Paula Schweitzer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Staci Shafer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Marianna Geyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.41
Zenaida Camacho
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jennifer Mcmillan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marianna Geyer + Ana Paula Schweitzer6844% games+6.7% vs expected
Staci Shafer + Marianna Geyer41141% games+2.9% vs expected
Staci Shafer + Zenaida Camacho185739% games−1.5% vs expected
Staci Shafer + Ana Paula Schweitzer51148% games−2.6% vs expected
Zenaida Camacho + Marianna Geyer5846% gamesnot enough data
Zenaida Camacho + Ana Paula Schweitzer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ana Paula Schweitzer
105W–100L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Staci Shafer
196W–223L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
2.91
3
Marianna Geyer
86W–146L career · 3 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
2.64
3
Zenaida Camacho
93W–164L career · 3 lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
2.41
Jennifer Mcmillan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.