Teams

Olympic Lukach

2024 SUMMER 65&O Women · Summer 7.0W

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSibyl Straughter / Donna Morley vs Cynthia Pawlarczyk / Teressa Sciore6-4, 2-5, 1-0
2024-06-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesDonna Morley / Sibyl Straughter vs Sara Harris / Alisa Sagar4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-06-06vs Elysium EllisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBarbara Koch / Nancy Lucas vs Lisa Westwater / Catherine O'Connell2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDonna Morley / Cathy Kuzma vs Marsha Friedli / Martha Pfeifer7-5, 5-2
2024-05-30vs Elysium EllisLost 02
L#1 DoublesBlythe Brown / Donna Morley vs Karen Heyob / Catherine O'Connell4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSibyl Straughter / Lisette Lichtenstein vs Lisa Westwater / Mary Anne Acer1-6, 4-6
2024-05-23vs Elysium EllisLost 12
W#1 DoublesBlythe Brown / Barbara Koch vs Catherine O'Connell / Karen Heyob6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDonna Morley / Cathy Kuzma vs Deborah Ellis / Mary Anne Acer1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLisette Lichtenstein / Karen Sampson vs Martha Pfeifer / Cynthia Pawlarczyk2-6, 2-6
2024-05-16vs Elysium EllisLost 01
L#3 DoublesBlythe Brown / Nancy Lucas vs Lisa Westwater / Mary Anne Acer6-7, 0-6
2024-05-02vs Elysium EllisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Sampson / Nancy Lucas vs Deborah Ellis / Mary Anne Acer2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Morley / Cathy Kuzma vs Susan Grunert / Linda McBride7-5, 5-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Summer 7.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Elysium Ellis6116512137
2Olympic Lukach1651634222

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Barbara Wiese
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.35
Blythe Brown
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Barbara Koch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Donna Morley
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Lisette Lichtenstein
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Sibyl Straughter
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Cathy Kuzma
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.75
Georgann Long
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.72
Sarah Lukach
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Sampson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Lucas
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Nancy Russell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Morley + Sibyl Straughter3452% games+2.8% vs expected
Nancy Lucas + Barbara Wiese7942% games−11.0% vs expected
Barbara Koch + Blythe Brown4250% gamesnot enough data
Lisette Lichtenstein + Cathy Kuzma0538% gamesnot enough data
Donna Morley + Cathy Kuzma224 matchesnot enough data
Lisette Lichtenstein + Sibyl Straughter044 matchesnot enough data
Sibyl Straughter + Karen Sampson224 matchesnot enough data
Sibyl Straughter + Cathy Kuzma044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Barbara Wiese
97W–104L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Blythe Brown
67W–69L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Barbara Koch
19W–25L career · type S · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Donna Morley
65W–77L career · 6 lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
3.09
Lisette Lichtenstein
40W–50L career · 6 lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.98
Sibyl Straughter
51W–81L career · 3 lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
2.83
3
Cathy Kuzma
132W–189L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Georgann Long
50W–45L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
Sarah Lukach
53W–76L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.72
Karen Sampson
36W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Lucas
34W–54L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Russell
38W–66L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.