Teams

MLong-ENO

2025 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Women Evening

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-01vs SFranks-ENOLost 01
L#2 SinglesCharmayne Rozenek vs Laurie Straube0-6, 1-6
2025-06-10vs Post-Rust/McGill-DFCLost 01
L#3 SinglesCharmayne Rozenek vs Adrianne Leinbach6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-02vs SFranks-ENOLost 01
L#2 SinglesCharmayne Rozenek vs Sarah Franks1-6, 0-6
2025-05-15Won 10
W#3 SinglesCharmayne Rozenek vs Renee Wesson0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-13vs EWyngaarden-HRLost 01
L#3 SinglesCharmayne Rozenek vs Laura Privalle2-6, 2-6
2025-05-06vs Post-Rust/McGill-DFCLost 01
L#2 SinglesCharmayne Rozenek vs Nhon Nicole Cobb3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Kim Peters
published
3.41
Jane Okulski
published
2.93
Charmayne Rozenek
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.87
Sheza Healey
published
2.82
Mary T Long
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Peters
23W–22L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Jane Okulski
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.41
3
Charmayne Rozenek
7W–21L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Sheza Healey
13W–27L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
Mary T Long
48W–104L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.