Teams

CDTA S A18M4.0 7Tam Huh Sun 11 $22

CDTA 1Summer Adult 18 & Over wknd · nght

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-13vs CDTA S A18M4.0 1Tam Bhat Sat 1 $22Split 22
L#1 SinglesRicky Young vs Brent Chatham4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesTy Caughell / Gene Huh vs Collin Moore / Jordan Federbush6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMingxian Tian vs Gerardo Vega6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMatthew Ness / David Canovas vs Andrew Zens / Keith Sgariglia3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRicky Young vs Reid Bertsche6-4, 4-1
L#2 DoublesHenry Liu / David Canovas vs Scott Moss / Brian Green4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMingxian Tian vs John Schwan6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesGene Huh / Ty Caughell vs Greg Goalwin / Jason Richardson6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRicky Young vs Liam Nance7-6, 2-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTerrence Gamboa / Henry Liu vs Brett Wangman / Daniel Willmeng7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMark Krizmanich / Ty Caughell vs Rafael Lozada / Joseph Daumen3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRicky Young vs Elliot Mathew6-3, 2-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTerrence Gamboa / Jacob Kim vs Will Hu / Julio Perez3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Canovas / Henry Liu vs Arun Balaji Balu / Asheesh Singh6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRicky Young vs Dan Saviano6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMingxian Tian vs Marco Amaro6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDavid Canovas / Henry Liu vs Carlos Canetta / Joel Relova6-1, 6-1
2025-06-01vs CDTA S A18M4.0 4Tam Aguayo Sat 1 $22Split 22
W#1 SinglesRicky Young vs Kevin Thompson6-3, 4-2
L#2 DoublesHenry Liu / Jacob Kim vs Charles Phelps / Randy Orr4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMingxian Tian vs Jacek Grabiec6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTy Caughell / Gene Huh vs John Leubner / Ernesto Diaz1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 DoublesJacob Kim / David Canovas vs Yasukazu Nagatake / KOHEI YAMAMOTO3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRicky Young vs Toshio Sato1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Chopp / Ty Caughell vs Yoshitaka Nakahara / Masaki Nozawa2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMingxian Tian vs Sho Mizokawa4-6, 1-5
W#3 DoublesTerrence Gamboa / Matthew Ness vs Masanori Kobayashi / Youngbin Lim6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for nght have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Lin
published 4.5
3.79
Ricky Young
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.76
David Chopp
published 4
3.75
Terrence Gamboa
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Chester Choi
published 4
David Canovas
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
David Kaufman
published 4
3.75
Mingxian Tian
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.73
Jacob Kim
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.70
Ty Caughell
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.69
Matthew Ness
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Gene Huh
published 4
3.40
Leo Kanev
published 3.5
Henry Liu
published
Lawrence Mabes
published
Mark Krizmanich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Schoon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gene Huh + Ty Caughell8251% games+9.0% vs expected
Gene Huh + Mark Krizmanich6552% games+0.7% vs expected
Lawrence Mabes + David Chopp044 matchesnot enough data
Ty Caughell + David Chopp224 matchesnot enough data
David Chopp + Ricky Young404 matchesnot enough data
Jacob Kim + Matthew Ness224 matchesnot enough data
Terrence Gamboa + Gene Huh033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Lin
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ricky Young
22W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
David Chopp
148W–121L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
Terrence Gamboa
20W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Chester Choi
4W–23L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
David Canovas
2W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
David Kaufman
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mingxian Tian
12W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Jacob Kim
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Ty Caughell
24W–46L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Matthew Ness
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Gene Huh
27W–33L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Leo Kanev
198W–171L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Henry Liu
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lawrence Mabes
32W–23L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Krizmanich
15W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Schoon
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.