Teams

Team Marlene

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 2.80 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-18vs Team ChristieWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Brunner / Kathy McArthur vs Christie Wyzykowski / Eleanor Morse1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMichelle Dietz vs Julie Morris6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMarlene Dodge / Aliki Joannides vs Cecilia Hopper / Lesleigh Kowalski Frank6-4, 6-2
2025-05-18vs Team JulieLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Dietz / Aliki Joannides vs Kai Sims / Victoria Yu1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMarlene Dodge vs Julie Raymond-Yakoubian4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Brunner / Kathy McArthur vs Blair Robinson / Penny Rohacek6-0, 6-2
2025-05-17vs Team JulieLost 03
L#1 DoublesAliki Joannides / Kathy McArthur vs Song Bliss / Penny Rohacek3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Dietz vs Julie Raymond-Yakoubian6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Brunner / Marlene Dodge vs Kai Sims / Victoria Yu6-7, 5-7
2025-05-17vs Team ChristieLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Dietz / Kathy McArthur vs Cecilia Hopper / Christie Wyzykowski5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAliki Joannides vs Eleanor Morse3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Brunner / Marlene Dodge vs Julie Morris / Lesleigh Kowalski Frank6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team Julie40102465
2Team Marlene134816106

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Susan Brunner
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Michelle Dietz
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Kathy McArthur
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.54
Marlene Dodge
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Aliki Joannides
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Brunner + Kathy McArthur2355% games+7.6% vs expected
Susan Brunner + Michelle Dietz044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Susan Brunner
112W–99L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Michelle Dietz
25W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Kathy McArthur
64W–98L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
2.76
2.5
Marlene Dodge
33W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%39%61%
2.54
2.5
Aliki Joannides
7W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.