Teams

Processed

Summer USTA Central Indiana Adult 18 & Over · Administration Area - Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
2022-07-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesSiby Hill / Melissa Huebner vs Katie Filler / Donnell Siebert6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-07-13Lost 01
L#2 SinglesSiby Hill vs Amy Deckard3-6, 2-5
2022-07-05Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSiby Hill / Crissy Lutz vs Lyn Reed / Debra Ladendorf3-6, 4-6
2022-06-29Lost 01
L#2 SinglesSiby Hill vs Janis Buesching6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-06-28Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTammy Wede / Siby Hill vs Amy Barrett / Jennifer Iovino4-6, 2-6
2022-06-26Lost 01
L#1 SinglesSiby Hill vs Cindy Martin1-6, 0-6
2022-06-21Lost 01
L#2 SinglesSiby Hill vs Jesika Musall0-6, 2-6
2022-06-15Won 10
W#2 SinglesSiby Hill vs Rachael Pfenninger6-2, 4-2
2022-06-14Won 10
W#2 SinglesSiby Hill vs Whitney Freeman6-0, 6-1
2022-06-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesLindsay Schroeder / Julie Garvin vs Kiera Mast / Kari Huddleston6-3, 6-0
2022-06-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesSiby Hill / Melissa Huebner vs April Blauser / Tuni DEIGNAN6-1, 6-1
2022-06-01Won 10
W#2 SinglesSiby Hill vs Tammy Hill6-2, 6-1
2022-05-31Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisamaria Burkhard / Julie Garvin vs Kari Kittleson / Dahnya Chop1-6, 1-2
2022-05-31Lost 01
L#2 SinglesSiby Hill vs Natalie Koriath2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Administration Area - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Siby Hill
usually #2 Singles 58%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Teresa Maxwell
published
2.89
Heather Luddy
published 3
2.54
Molly Carnes
published
2.42
Susan Bentley
published
Jillian Heaton
published
Julie Garvin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Gunderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Bentley + Molly Carnes71241% games−6.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Siby Hill
115W–89L career · 12 lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
3.42
Teresa Maxwell
56W–68L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3
Heather Luddy
5W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.89
Molly Carnes
27W–77L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
2.54
Susan Bentley
24W–68L career · no lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
2.42
Jillian Heaton
86W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Garvin
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Gunderson
30W–29L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.