Teams

PRC GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-31vs LTFC TEALLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaureen Gsand / Julie Trent vs Shawn Blackwood / Leslie DeVilliers2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSherri Hutcheon / Elizabeth Anderson vs Selket Allen / Denise Tappen3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDenise Dickson / Seanna Mulligan vs Leigh Dunn / Carla Gamet4-6, 2-6
2022-05-27vs HRCA REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesPatricia Haas / Brenda Amundsen vs Sarah Plagenza / Amy Quinette6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMaureen Gsand / Sherri Hutcheon vs Carole Dagnon / Jody Walker4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesHeather Stohlton vs Stacey Hayward0-5
L#3 DoublesJulie Trent / Seanna Mulligan vs Kimberly Graves / Hanne Schauer7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2022-05-17vs CACI BLUEWon 41
W#1 DoublesHeather Beasley / Heather Stohlton vs Holly Kortum / Mary Candee7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBrenda Amundsen vs Sarah Springer7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPatricia Haas / Sherri Hutcheon vs Susan Ham / Susan Cole4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDenise Dickson vs Cheryl Sontheimer5-5
L#3 DoublesDeborah Fields / Elizabeth Anderson vs Angela Rose / Somsi Stringer2-6, 1-6
2022-05-10vs PCRK TEALSplit 22
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Anderson / Maureen Gsand vs Christine Aberle / Mary Ingolia3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDeborah Fields vs Anne Mills0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRaylean Furnish / Heather Beasley vs Karmen Davis / Debra Stamatis5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSherri Hutcheon / Heather Stohlton vs Barbara Gentry / Jody Mumaugh6-1, 7-5
2022-05-03vs CPV ORANGELost 13
L#1 DoublesBrenda Amundsen / Denise Dickson vs Mayme McDonald / Nancy Carr6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesHeather Stohlton vs Caroline Hansen7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRaylean Furnish / Julie Trent vs Yvette Watson / Mira Brand2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia Haas / Seanna Mulligan vs Susan Miles / Marcia Nash5-7, 2-6
2022-04-26vs SSLT GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesHeather Beasley / Patricia Haas vs Tanya Taylor / Mary Dolhancey2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDenise Dickson / Heather Stohlton vs Joey Rothman / Hallie Lombard3-2
W#3 DoublesSherri Hutcheon / Seanna Mulligan vs Chris Darrow / Jan McClaren6-3, 6-4
2022-04-19vs PRC BLUELost 14
L#1 DoublesBrenda Amundsen / Maureen Gsand vs Meghan Bennett / Lise Olsen-Dufour4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesHeather Stohlton vs Kristin Prosowski7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Anderson / Heather Beasley vs Ellen Irwin / Marcie Manuello1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSeanna Mulligan vs Amber Jorgensen1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSherri Hutcheon / Sarah Zhang vs Charlie Ghidotti / Taryn Smallwood7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Brenda Amundsen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.74
Heather Stohlton
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.62
Maureen Gsand
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Sherri Hutcheon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.60
Deborah Fields
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Denise Dickson
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Julie Maxwell
published
3.26
Heather Beasley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Seanna Mulligan
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Julie Trent
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Patricia Haas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Raylean Furnish
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Maxwell + Brenda Amundsen3260% games+17.7% vs expected
Denise Dickson + Brenda Amundsen352055% games+5.0% vs expected
Denise Dickson + Sherri Hutcheon2843% games−4.9% vs expected
Denise Dickson + Heather Stohlton1431% gamesnot enough data
Julie Maxwell + Deborah Fields044 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Fields + Brenda Amundsen314 matchesnot enough data
Heather Stohlton + Sherri Hutcheon314 matchesnot enough data
Julie Maxwell + Denise Dickson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brenda Amundsen
69W–56L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Heather Stohlton
62W–64L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Maureen Gsand
48W–37L career · 4 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Sherri Hutcheon
43W–70L career · 6 lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
3.60
4
Deborah Fields
8W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Denise Dickson
68W–104L career · 4 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
Julie Maxwell
28W–27L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Heather Beasley
32W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Seanna Mulligan
30W–56L career · 5 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Julie Trent
2W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Haas
6W–13L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Raylean Furnish
6W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.