Dagger 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM
2026 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women 18 & Over
12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA
Schedule5 played
i
Flight standings16 teams · 6.5 Women 18 & Over
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Bodine/Lane 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM | 2 | 0 | 2 | 35 |
| 2Dagger 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM | 2 | 0 | 3 | 47 |
| 3Holderness / Benfield 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM | 2 | 0 | 4 | 41 |
| 4Tuhro 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM | 2 | 0 | 4 | 46 |
| 5Esson 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM | 2 | 0 | 5 | 46 |
| 6Davis/Choros 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM | 2 | 0 | 6 | 54 |
| 7Falls/Howell 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM | 1 | 0 | 2 | 24 |
| 8Allred/McPherson 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM | 1 | 1 | 6 | 50 |
| 9Fields 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM | 1 | 1 | 8 | 62 |
| 10Tao/OShaughnessy 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM | 0 | 1 | 6 | 36 |
| 11Clift/Cope 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM | 0 | 2 | 8 | 63 |
| 12Winstead/Terrell 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM | 0 | 2 | 8 | 64 |
| 13Bunch/Pitts 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM | 0 | 2 | 8 | 62 |
| 14Wykoff 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM | 0 | 2 | 9 | 62 |
| 15Phelps 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM | 0 | 2 | 10 | 64 |
| 16Robinson/Gingerich 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM | 0 | 2 | 10 | 68 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Courtney Dagger + LaJean Morrow Smith | 3–3 | 50% games | not enough data |
| Courtney Dagger + Amy Geer | 2–2 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Janet Howard + Sandy Cathers | 1–3 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Courtney Dagger + Ashlyn Wilson | 1–2 | 3 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.