Teams

RHaywood (OPRC)

2026 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Men - Wed PM

10 players · average NTRP 5.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-06vs QCarmean (Queens)Split 11
W#1 DoublesRob Haywood / Blake Elder vs Bradley Beck / Jacob Andress6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesScott Fligel / John Carpenter vs Andy Misiaveg / AJ Thomas3-6, 5-7
2026-04-29vs LNali (Blakeney)Won 20
W#1 DoublesClaes Persson / Sam Dean vs Berhe Serekeberhan / Matt Poulos6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRob Haywood / Leslie McIver vs Kevin Beard / Jacob Scheinler6-1, 6-1
2026-04-15vs QCarmean (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesRob Haywood vs David Hager5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNiclas Nilsson / Scott Fligel vs AJ Thomas / Gerald Newburg4-6, 2-6
2026-04-08vs LNali (Blakeney)Won 20
W#1 DoublesScott Fligel / Sam Dean vs Matt Poulos / Jacob Scheinler6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesFabio Medina vs Karim Fotso6-2, 6-1
2026-03-25vs QCarmean (Queens)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesNiclas Nilsson / Will Turner vs Quinn Carmean / Sean Carmean3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesRob Haywood vs Edward Fitzgibbons7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLeslie McIver / Timothy Snead vs David Hager / AJ Thomas3-6, 1-6
2026-03-18vs LNali (Blakeney)Split 11
L#1 DoublesRob Haywood / Leslie McIver vs Berhe Serekeberhan / Willie Dann6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDevang Desai / Timothy Snead vs Matt Poulos / Jacob Scheinler7-6, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Men - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.77 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.90
Leslie McIver
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.88
Sam Dean
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.81
Scott Fligel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.76
Niclas Nilsson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Blake Elder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Devang Desai
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
Fabio Medina
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.66
Rob Haywood
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
4.63
Claes Persson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Timothy Snead
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie McIver
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
4.90
Sam Dean
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
4.88
Scott Fligel
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.81
Niclas Nilsson
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
4.76
5
Blake Elder
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
5
Devang Desai
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
5
Fabio Medina
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Rob Haywood
12W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
4.66
5
Claes Persson
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
15%85%<1%
4.63
Timothy Snead
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.