Teams

SWW-Pinyerd

2025 One Doubles-Winter · 4.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Engelmann / Matthew Simons vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-18vs SWW-MettlerLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristopher Engelmann / Andrew Timmons vs Soap Ngeth / Schuyler Soderlind3-6, 2-6
2025-08-01vs SWW-MettlerLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristopher Engelmann / Jonathan Chow vs Michael Cheong / Mark Mettler7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2025-04-20vs SWW-MettlerLost 01
L#1 DoublesJosh Pinyerd / Jonathan Chow vs Michael Cheong / Mark Mettler2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SWW-Mettler3131338
2SWW-Pinyerd1313639

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.21 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Matthew Simons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Jonathan Chow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Christopher Engelmann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Josh Pinyerd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Andrew Timmons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Timmons + Josh Pinyerd2443% games−8.4% vs expected
Christopher Engelmann + Andrew Timmons3739% games−11.7% vs expected
Christopher Engelmann + Josh Pinyerd224 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Simons + Christopher Engelmann123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Matthew Simons
35W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Jonathan Chow
23W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Christopher Engelmann
15W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Josh Pinyerd
93W–84L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Andrew Timmons
21W–40L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.