Teams

Agrelius - LFTC

USTA FLEX LEAGUE -- SEASON IV -- DOES NOT AFFECT NTRP (A) · FULL REFUNDED(7

2 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings10 teams · FULL REFUNDED(7
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sarah Crawford - GTC000000
2Agrelius - LFTC000000
3brooke beasley - GCC000000
4Nhi - Bellview Park000000
5Double Shots - SSH000000
6Gooners - NIWOT000000
7Margot Labree(refund for comp entry from season 3)000000
8Linda Sjoberg(refund for comp entry from season 3)000000
9Party at the Net (sent refund to Cindy 8/1)000000
10SEND REFUND TO CINDY(8/16)000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
KC Agrelius
published 4.5
3.46
Ashley Agrelius
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
KC Agrelius
33W–47L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
3.5
Ashley Agrelius
92W–138L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.