Teams

String Theory 55+ 7.0

2025 Montgomery Adult 55 & Over · Montgomery Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-11vs I'd Hit That 55+ 7.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesStephen Rawlings / Bruce Knolmayer vs Jin Soh / Robert Seidel7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-05vs Defenders 55+ 7.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeonid Leznik / John Sze vs James Forbes / Richard McKeon2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-05-22vs I'd Hit That 55+ 7.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBruce Knolmayer / John Sze vs Jin Soh / Robert Seidel3-6, 6-7
2025-05-18vs Defenders 55+ 7.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesLeonid Leznik / John Sze vs Mark Lavoie / Bassem Melhem6-3, 6-1
2025-05-09vs Smiles and Laughs 55+7.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesLeonid Leznik / Volker Englisch vs John Zhong / Jian Liu6-4, 6-4
2025-05-07vs I'd Hit That 55+ 7.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesIvan Teelucksingh / Leonid Leznik vs Greg Koch / Robert Hoffman2-6, 3-6
2025-05-04vs Defenders 55+ 7.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBruce Knolmayer / John Sze vs Majed Hamawy / Jim Leveque2-6, 4-6
2025-04-24vs Smiles and Laughs 55+7.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBruce Knolmayer / Leonid Leznik vs Jianping Xu / Shiqiang Li6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Leonid Leznik
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.37
Ryan Poole
published
3.35
Bruce Knolmayer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Gerald McClellan
published
3.08
Volker Englisch
published
2.88
Stephen Rawlings
published
2.85
Kevin Ro
published
Ivan Teelucksingh
published
John Sze
published
Taft Irons
published
Tim Sawyer
published
Timothy Triplett
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Leonid Leznik
189W–121L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
Ryan Poole
27W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Bruce Knolmayer
124W–136L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Gerald McClellan
11W–16L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Volker Englisch
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
Stephen Rawlings
2W–14L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.88
Kevin Ro
18W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Ivan Teelucksingh
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Sze
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Taft Irons
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tim Sawyer
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Timothy Triplett
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.