Teams

HG TEAL

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.07 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-14vs SS-D PURPLEWon 31
W#1 DoublesAngela Jilece / Heather Harrington vs Brooke Rebstock / Margaret Lee6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesValerie Peterson vs Jessica Wise6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMolly Svendsen / Amy DiOrio vs Lauren Engelsberg / Natalie Bernstein6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesErica Palmer / Jeni Anderson vs Bridgette Ward / McKay Pittman6-7, 1-6
2025-07-07vs SS-LT GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesHeather Harrington / Angela Jilece vs Vera Case / Sharon Iuston6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMolly Svendsen vs LYNNEA HUTTON4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHeidi Custer / Amy DiOrio vs Luisa Dutzar / Michelle Butzke6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesErica Palmer / Valerie Peterson vs Laurie Porter / Denise Hawkins3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-30vs WC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesAngela Jilece / Amy DiOrio vs Katherine Roth / Laura Kemper6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesHeather Harrington vs Lisa Knurek6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMolly Svendsen / Jeni Anderson vs Katherine Hurley / Erin Herman7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesErica Palmer / Allison Rampley vs Susan Gross / Tracy Klein4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-06-23vs HW REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesHeather Harrington / Angela Jilece vs Traci Yuran / Blythe Leinwand6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAmy DiOrio vs Julie King6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHeidi Custer / Sarah Mesner vs Kelly Kane / Tiffany Kerber6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesErica Palmer / Molly Svendsen vs Tracy Sickels / Jamie Vonfeldt6-4, 6-3
2025-06-16vs SS-H GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesHeidi Custer / Sarah Mesner vs Debbie Lepetsos / Karen Miller6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesHeather Harrington vs Katie Johnson6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesValerie Peterson / Allison Rampley vs Suzette Loving / Leslie Suh3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJeni Anderson / Erica Palmer vs Catharine Miller / Shelley Reed6-0, 6-2
2025-06-09vs LEBTC REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesSarah Mesner / Amy DiOrio vs Maria Jump / Tosha MacK6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesHeidi Custer vs Mollie Anderson6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJeni Anderson / Molly Svendsen vs Michelle Price / Sarah Hays7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesErica Palmer / Valerie Peterson vs Keri Hanson / Sheryl Rose3-6, 3-6
2025-06-02vs HW GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesSarah Mesner / Amy DiOrio vs Kimberlee Harmon / Nicole Moore4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeidi Custer / Allison Rampley vs Kara Edmiston Lavaux / Laurie McElroy4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJeni Anderson / Valerie Peterson vs Jessica Stretz Storm / Brianna Gass2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Heather Harrington
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.22
Angela Jilece
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Amy DiOrio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Heidi Custer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.82
Allison Rampley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Sarah Mesner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Valerie Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.59
Jeni Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.56
Erica Palmer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.56
Molly Svendsen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Harrington + Angela Jilece6085% games+25.9% vs expected
Sarah Mesner + Amy DiOrio3253% games+7.2% vs expected
Erica Palmer + Valerie Peterson2347% games+2.6% vs expected
Jeni Anderson + Molly Svendsen61048% games−4.5% vs expected
Heidi Custer + Sarah Mesner3649% games−7.4% vs expected
Heidi Custer + Jeni Anderson3445% games−9.6% vs expected
Allison Rampley + Valerie Peterson3253% gamesnot enough data
Molly Svendsen + Amy DiOrio4157% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heather Harrington
60W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Angela Jilece
12W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3
Amy DiOrio
40W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Heidi Custer
79W–72L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Allison Rampley
11W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Sarah Mesner
24W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Valerie Peterson
13W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
2.65
Jeni Anderson
31W–63L career · 5 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
2.59
2.5
Erica Palmer
21W–21L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%33%67%
2.56
Molly Svendsen
17W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.