Teams

Pucci, Michael

2021 Adult 40 & Over 3.0 - 4.5 - Weekend · 4.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2021-03-13vs HOA/HolsingerWC/40&Over4.0MLost 13
L#1 DoublesDamon Gatewood / Daniel Curley vs Timothy Buller / John Kotre5-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesScott Kirsch vs Oliver Schmidt6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJohn Orlich / Joseph Ubalde vs Trevor Holsinger / Jon Joffe7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKris Chatrathi / John Burdolski vs John Beckley / Kurussh Amrolia7-5, 0-3, 1-0
2021-02-20vs HOA/Stroede/40&Over4.0MLost 13
L#1 DoublesDan Johnson / Michael Pucci vs Jan Claussen / Ravi Peru2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesScott Kirsch vs Jeff Ganaden3-6, 5-5
W#2 DoublesJoseph Ubalde / James Dawkins vs John Stroede / R Scott Hanover6-4, 6-5
L#3 DoublesNorman Friedman / Sam Cargnel vs Mitchell Bennett / Jeff Thimgan2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Daniel Curley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Scott Kirsch
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.53
Henry Arst
published 4
3.52
Kris Chatrathi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Norman Friedman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
James Dawkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Damon Gatewood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Burdolski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Orlich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joseph Ubalde
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kyle Stagnito
published
Michael Pucci
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sam Cargnel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Kirsch + Kyle Stagnito3353% games+3.1% vs expected
Norman Friedman + James Dawkins5649% games+2.6% vs expected
Norman Friedman + Sam Cargnel161052% games+0.3% vs expected
Kris Chatrathi + Norman Friedman4749% games−1.0% vs expected
Norman Friedman + Henry Arst1443% gamesnot enough data
Henry Arst + John Burdolski2339% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Curley + Scott Kirsch224 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Ubalde + Norman Friedman224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniel Curley
22W–30L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Scott Kirsch
59W–43L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Henry Arst
19W–52L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.53
Kris Chatrathi
25W–45L career · 1 line in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.52
Norman Friedman
71W–78L career · 1 line in 2021
43%57%<1%
3.52
4
James Dawkins
25W–52L career · 1 line in 2021
59%41%<1%
3.47
Damon Gatewood
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
John Burdolski
14W–26L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
John Orlich
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Joseph Ubalde
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kyle Stagnito
12W–16L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Pucci
11W–31L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Sam Cargnel
35W–27L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.