Teams

RCC RED

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-26vs CSU GOLDLost 23
W#1 DoublesEmily Paulson / Chelsea Crowell vs Meredith McClellan / Hanna Grow-Morales6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesVictoria Tait vs Natalie Wijesinghe1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrittany Guidetti / K Autumn Hartley vs Olivia Doehr / Madissen Allen1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesGinger Phillips vs Ellie Hartman7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTara Kim / Kate Allison vs Lindsey Welch / Katherine Selby4-6, 3-6
2026-05-12vs LVTA REDWon 32
W#1 DoublesChelsea Crowell / Victoria Tait vs Caryl Abeyta / Kelsey Keene6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesGinger Phillips vs Emily Revielle6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEmily Pedersen / Katie Johnstone vs Emma Jo Wiley / Andrea Motley6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBrittany Guidetti vs Kelly Blanks5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKate Allison / Klara Fitzgerald vs Erin Hauser-Roe / Trudy Samuelson6-1, 6-1
2026-05-05vs HMTC YELLOWWon 41
L#1 DoublesEmily Paulson / Leah Carmalt vs Elina George / Carmen Kilday0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesGinger Phillips vs Carolina Moore6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEmily Pedersen / Chelsea Crowell vs Linda Jirouskova / Suzanne Hale6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesBrittany Guidetti vs Alina Galyon6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristine LaBerge / Kate Allison vs Mitzi Johnson / Kaili Young6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-28vs BCC TEALWon 41
W#1 DoublesEmily Pedersen / Chelsea Crowell vs Jane Catherine Bracken / Brigette Paige7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesGinger Phillips vs Kristen Ford6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChristine LaBerge / Katie Johnstone vs Cat Diehl / Monika Thon4-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesVictoria Tait vs Rachael Sparks6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKlara Fitzgerald / Kate Allison vs Wendi Hill / JILLIAN HOLMSTROM6-1, 6-4
2026-04-21vs MEA PURPLEWon 41
W#1 DoublesEmily Paulson / Christine LaBerge vs Brooke Larson / Lori Nothwang3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrittany Guidetti vs Tessa Botha0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChelsea Crowell / Victoria Tait vs Holly Brown / Sue McGee6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTara Kim vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLeah Carmalt / Katie Johnstone vs Tanya Saarva / Christie Deluca6-2, 7-6
2026-04-14vs LAC PURPLEWon 32
W#1 DoublesEmily Paulson / Klara Fitzgerald vs Chrisanne Kuester / Sara Palmer6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesGinger Phillips vs Rachel Schneider6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesVictoria Tait / Leah Carmalt vs Lynn Schulte / Bobbi Billings7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesK Autumn Hartley vs Anabella Wilkinson0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesEmily Pedersen / Katie Johnstone vs Joyce Kelly / Sydney Bell6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings46 teams · WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HV SILVER70241125276
2CVTA BLACK61251025262
3KC-RH GREEN61231227258
4TTA PINK6126928283
5LEBTC GOLD6126929291
6SKY BLACK51181227245
7RHCC YELLOW52221331273
8VC PINK52231231259
9BCC ORANGE52241131297
10FOX NAVY52221332285
11MC NAVY52221333286
12GAC PURPLE52191635276
13SKY YELLOW52201536305
14VCC GREEN52181739295
15CHCC GOLD43201532266
16CPV RED43201536295
17KNO BLUE43181737293
18PCC GOLD43211437297
19DTP NAVY43201538326
20SH GOLD43181741325
21LEBTC PINK43181742327
22BCC GOLD43181742318
23BM BLUE43152044347
24RCC RED34171839327
25KNO RED34171841312
26SS-LT TEAL34181741324
27PRKR NAVY34161943335
28SS-H BLACK34152043334
29GPTC RED34161944340
30BCC YELLOW34152044315
31CM ORANGE34142145342
32CM TEAL34142145333
33DTP PINK24121840300
34DPR-B TEAL24111941294
35SS-LT GOLD25152046326
36DCHS YELLOW25132247326
37WC RED25122351367
38MVCC PURPLE25102552373
39WP-O RED15131740284
40GR SILVER16142145332
41KC-RH ORANGE16122348349
42SS-H RED16122349349
43PCC SILVER16122349355
44CCC TEAL16102555369
45SS-LT RED1682756368
46GCC TEAL1662962387

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.29 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Ginger Phillips
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
4.49
Chelsea Crowell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.45
Emily Paulson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.40
Victoria Tait
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
4.38
Christine LaBerge
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.37
Klara Fitzgerald
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.33
Katie Johnstone
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.26
Emily Pedersen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.16
Brittany Guidetti
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.03
Kate Allison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Tara Kim
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.02
K Autumn Hartley
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chelsea Crowell + Emily Pedersen7068% games+6.2% vs expected
Katie Johnstone + Emily Pedersen4166% games+4.3% vs expected
Chelsea Crowell + Victoria Tait303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ginger Phillips
26W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
4.54
4.5
Chelsea Crowell
129W–46L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
4.49
Emily Paulson
19W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
4.45
Victoria Tait
20W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
4.40
4.5
Christine LaBerge
69W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
4.38
Klara Fitzgerald
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
4.37
4.5
Katie Johnstone
89W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
Emily Pedersen
31W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Brittany Guidetti
60W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
4.16
Kate Allison
19W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
4.03
Tara Kim
34W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.02
4.5
K Autumn Hartley
77W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.