Teams

Wilkerson-Sanders/McKee-Powell W3.5F

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-31vs The Lakes TA/Akbany-Little W3.5FLost 02
L#2 DoublesHeidi McKee / Sandy Beysselance vs Tracy Akbany / Kristie Lipper4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHsiao-Lan Wilson / Leigh Powell vs Audrey Jarrin / Karen McLeland7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-10-24Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLeigh Powell / Phuong Nguyen vs Paula Marbach / Christine Nelson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-10-10vs TBarM/Mizerany W3.5FWon 10
W#2 DoublesSandy Beysselance / Hsiao-Lan Wilson vs Diane Mizerany / Rebecca Howey5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-03vs Eldorado/Miller W3.5FWon 10
W#2 DoublesHeidi McKee / Leigh Powell vs Tatyana Borukhovich / Erma Bryant7-6, 6-2
2025-09-19vs McKinney/Colston-Bowersox W3.5FLost 01
L#1 SinglesLeigh Powell vs Hope Jacoby1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Ella Li
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Heidi McKee
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.39
Hsiao-Lan Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Maia Lamarque
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.36
Hsiao-Wen Chang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Yuko Lowe
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.17
Lily Treacy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Tina Condit
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Leigh Powell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.06
Vanessa Rizzari
published
3.02
Kathryn Dehmer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.86
Sandy Beysselance
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Dawn Covin
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Julie Berg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.73
Liz Smart
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.66
Kathleen Nuytten
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Joanne Freebairn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ella Li + Hsiao-Lan Wilson6162% games+5.0% vs expected
Heidi McKee + Sandy Beysselance3446% gamesnot enough data
Maia Lamarque + Hsiao-Lan Wilson3252% gamesnot enough data
Lily Treacy + Hsiao-Lan Wilson3257% gamesnot enough data
Hsiao-Wen Chang + Ella Li4168% gamesnot enough data
Tina Condit + Lily Treacy224 matchesnot enough data
Maia Lamarque + Yuko Lowe314 matchesnot enough data
Maia Lamarque + Heidi McKee404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ella Li
30W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
Heidi McKee
24W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
Hsiao-Lan Wilson
30W–15L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Maia Lamarque
26W–16L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
Hsiao-Wen Chang
14W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
Yuko Lowe
13W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
Lily Treacy
17W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Tina Condit
10W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Leigh Powell
4W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
Vanessa Rizzari
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
Kathryn Dehmer
19W–12L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
Sandy Beysselance
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
2.86
3
Dawn Covin
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Julie Berg
9W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.80
Liz Smart
4W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Kathleen Nuytten
15W–24L career · 7 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
Joanne Freebairn
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.