Teams

4 Lakeside Howell

2023 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-16vs 8 MTC Stephens ResurgenceLost 02
L#1 DoublesSam McKelvey / Michael Hazelwood vs Donald Love / Greg Robinson3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLyman Brown / Dwight Ludwig vs Geoff Usher / Philip Rackliffe0-6, 3-6
2023-07-16vs 9 MRTC FinnSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSam McKelvey / Dwight Ludwig vs Lloyd Arnold / Heath Flohre6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLyman Brown / Vernon Heishman vs Terrance Milo / Charlie Wilson3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLyman Brown / Vernon Heishman vs Ryan Bardaro / Colin Atkinson6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-25vs 1 ACAC HollomonLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrian Cox / Lyman Brown vs Cliff Heller / William Crowe5-7, 1-6
2023-06-24Won 10
W#3 DoublesVernon Heishman / Lyman Brown vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-18vs 2 Raintree Middle Aged WarriorsLost 01
L#1 DoublesLyman Brown / Jay Abbud vs Ram Raghavan / Lee Brooks3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-06-10vs 3 TCRC Gibson 40AcesWon 10
W#3 DoublesLyman Brown / Brian Cox vs Bo Bowden / Don Ha6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-03vs 7 Westwood Nilson Icy-HotzLost 01
L#1 DoublesLyman Brown / Sam McKelvey vs Josh Reynal / Andrew Cecil6-1, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
LUDINEI PICELLI
published
3.78
Sam McKelvey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Dwight Ludwig
published 4
3.67
Jean-Luc Holzem
published
3.64
Jay Abbud
published
3.62
Michael Hazelwood
published
3.60
William Cosby
published
3.56
Alton Howell
published 4
3.54
Lyman Brown
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.49
Charlie Knight
published 4
3.37
Vernon Heishman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lyman Brown + Sam McKelvey2451% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

LUDINEI PICELLI
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
4.07
4
Sam McKelvey
158W–91L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Dwight Ludwig
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Jean-Luc Holzem
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
Jay Abbud
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
Michael Hazelwood
14W–21L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.62
William Cosby
11W–17L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Alton Howell
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Lyman Brown
183W–205L career · 8 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.54
4
Charlie Knight
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
Vernon Heishman
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.