Teams

Burns-Greer/18s/4.0-3.0/PAC

2026 Man · Cov Tri Level 18 & Over - Women Day

19 players · average NTRP 3.64 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule

Flight standings for Cov Tri Level 18 & Over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Amy Burdette
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Abby Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.64
Catherine Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.27
Amber Mata
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
3.26
Brooke Brown
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published 3.5
3.20
Dana Gegenheimer
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.15
Deborah Fournet
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.02
Laura Bonanno
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Molly Burns
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Katherine Gristina
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Laura Lucas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Leslie Ricalde
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
Lindsey Matherne
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 19% · published
Pamela Owen
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Patricia Schultz
usually #1 Doubles 61%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Sonia Maltais
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Taylor Bouche
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Taylor Fortune
usually #2 Doubles 52%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Victoria Bienvenu
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Owen + Deborah Fournet224 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Ricalde + Deborah Fournet123 matchesnot enough data
Amber Mata + Abby Hunt213 matchesnot enough data
Brooke Brown + Taylor Bouche303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Burdette
30W–14L career · 27 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.79
3.5
Abby Hunt
45W–9L career · 30 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.64
4
Catherine Martinez
30W–14L career · 10 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Amber Mata
22W–29L career · 28 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Brooke Brown
28W–6L career · 18 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Dana Gegenheimer
7W–20L career · type A · 8 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Deborah Fournet
11W–9L career · 9 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
Laura Bonanno
26W–18L career · 18 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
Molly Burns
40W–22L career · 21 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
Katherine Gristina
14W–7L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura Lucas
14W–10L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Leslie Ricalde
14W–17L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lindsey Matherne
19W–7L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pamela Owen
17W–14L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Schultz
25W–11L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sonia Maltais
2W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Taylor Bouche
24W–7L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Taylor Fortune
34W–10L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Victoria Bienvenu
11W–7L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.