Teams

V - Sunset Over Served

2023 USTA Adult 18 &Over - Ventura WE · V - Women 3.5 WE

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-08vs V - Sherwood Fun LovingWon 10
W#2 DoublesCierra Smalling / Gina Vazquez vs Rosella Farnum / Connie Mundell6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCierra Smalling / Gina Vazquez vs Anita Spraggs / Susan Delaney6-2, 7-5
2023-06-25Won 10
W#1 SinglesGina Vazquez vs Alexandra Kotlyar4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-05-06vs V - Ojai OrangesLost 01
L#2 DoublesTanya Thompson / Gina Vazquez vs Anne Williamson / Tahnie Toland6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-04-29vs V - North Ranch Ace AngelsWon 10
W#3 DoublesDana Lawrence / Gina Vazquez vs Erin Brubach / Silvia Benun7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for V - Women 3.5 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Ina Kim
published 3.5
3.39
Janice Pinnell
published
3.28
Gloria Liu
published 3.5
3.24
Sherry Meinhart
published
3.24
Dana Lawrence
published 3.5
3.24
Kate Centanni
published
3.13
Gina Vazquez
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.05
Deborah Cassar
published 3.5
3.00
Tanya Thompson
published
2.96
Marie Smith
published
2.96
Leah Cassar
published
2.45
Marilou Cheung
published
Megan Mathews
published
Susan Consoletti
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Pinnell + Ina Kim303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ina Kim
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.45
Janice Pinnell
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Gloria Liu
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
Sherry Meinhart
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Dana Lawrence
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
Kate Centanni
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Gina Vazquez
95W–140L career · 5 lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Deborah Cassar
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
Tanya Thompson
2W–12L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
Marie Smith
14W–17L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.96
Leah Cassar
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
Marilou Cheung
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
2.45
Megan Mathews
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Consoletti
1W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.