Teams

HCC Mixed Anyone? - C. MacCullough

2022 Hillsborough Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed 18 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 4.38 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-26vs Hills/S. Means - Hall of FramersLost 01
L#1 DoublesTania Biller / Samuel Biller vs Ignacio Molina / Jamie Hamilton3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-19vs HCC Hitters - A. GiangWon 10
W#1 DoublesSamuel Biller / Tania Biller vs Christine Hammerschmidt / Irving Corrales7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-05vs Hills/S. Means - Hall of FramersLost 12
L#1 DoublesJillene Davis / Zach Stubna vs Stephanie Means / Manuel Alvarez4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesStephen Felman / Elizabeth Gerlach vs Pablo Luigi / Maki Smith6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSamuel Biller / Tania Biller vs Kammie Bilardello / Ignacio Molina5-7, 3-6
2022-05-22vs HCC Hitters - A. GiangLost 02
L#1 DoublesLinda Dodds / Samuel Biller vs Mike Moenter / Christine Hammerschmidt2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStephen Felman / Elizabeth Gerlach vs Steven Michaelis / Lorraine Chon-Qui3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-04-10vs Hills/S. Means - Hall of FramersLost 02
L#1 DoublesTania Biller / Stephen Felman vs Stephanie Means / Manuel Alvarez6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSamuel Biller / Linda Dodds vs Gail Gibson / Griff McGoldrick4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.72
Stephen Felman
published
4.49
Clark MacCullough
published 4.5
4.31
Margaret Roset
published
4.27
Logan Reid
published
4.26
Samuel Biller
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.17
Zach Stubna
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.11
Elizabeth Gerlach
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.74
Tania Biller
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Jillene Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tania Biller + Samuel Biller21139% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephen Felman
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.72
4.5
Clark MacCullough
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
4.49
Margaret Roset
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
Logan Reid
11W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Samuel Biller
61W–85L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
4.26
Zach Stubna
42W–23L career · 1 line in 2022
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Elizabeth Gerlach
184W–98L career · 2 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
4
Tania Biller
75W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Jillene Davis
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.