Teams

ASunden (Raintree)

2022 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-10-05vs KHeidkamp (PCC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesShelby Stahl / Katrina Richards vs Carolyn Koonts / Janet Gilliam7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesStaci Wittek / Karen Allen vs Kay Porter / Judi Affeldt6-3, 6-2
2022-09-29vs LCulp/SDeVries (Queens)Won 20
W#1 DoublesPaula Abrams / Renee Ziemianski vs Nicole Badr / Debbie Glass6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStaci Wittek / Donna Marlowe vs Katelin Glass / Stacey Valitchka6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-09-28vs JLee (Colonel Beatty)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesDonna Marlowe / Staci Wittek vs Teresa Riley / Leen Jagers5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLee Steadman / Katrina Richards vs Gabriella Sansone / Brittany Marshall6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2022-09-26vs MMetzl (Sardis)Won 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Allen / Staci Wittek vs Sharon Storck / Sarah Asby6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMegan Hua Shaul / Lesley Quick vs Katherine Currier / Anne Whalan6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKatrina Richards / Shelby Stahl vs Martha Metzl / Kathryn Martin3-6, 3-6
2022-09-21vs JCohen/WRossi (Blakeney)Won 10
W#2 DoublesRenee Ziemianski / Denise Dexter vs Michelle Ludwiczak / Kelly Lull3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-09-14vs BBaker (Queens)Split 11
W#1 DoublesKatrina Richards / Alyson Sunden vs Kara Tringali / Sarah Zolper7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesStaci Wittek / Lee Steadman vs Brittany Baker / Lauren Spanos3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-09-07vs MDwyer (Carmel)Won 21
L#1 DoublesMegan Hua Shaul / Shelby Stahl vs Kathryn Klaus / Sarah Soule5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesStaci Wittek / Paula Abrams vs Jennifer Johnson / Lindsey Smith6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKaren Allen / Alyson Sunden vs SUSAN ALIOTA / Tricia Magee6-0, 6-1
2022-08-31vs ERoach/SJPragasam (Jeff Adams)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMegan Hua Shaul / Shelby Stahl vs Kristen Agee / Julie Hollifield4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStaci Wittek / Nicole Love vs SJ Pragasam / Leah Roop0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPaula Abrams / Katrina Richards vs Liesl Graf / Jennifer Little6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2022-08-24vs MTurturro/CFagan (OPRC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesKatrina Richards / Shelby Stahl vs Carolyn Ludwin / Anita Matai6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNicole Love / Lesley Quick vs Eileen Jones / Janet Newton6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRenee Ziemianski / Jill Smith vs Susan Tompkins / Lori Quattlebaum6-2, 6-2
2022-08-17vs LHuntington (Park Road)Won 30
W#1 DoublesDonna Marlowe / Staci Wittek vs Joanne Lee / Claudia Prager6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMegan Hua Shaul / Lesley Quick vs Lynne Herrin / Lisa Huntington6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLee Steadman / Rachel Hallsten vs Punky Brick / Pam Bright6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-08-10vs CMiles (Queens)Won 20
W#2 DoublesDonna Marlowe / Staci Wittek vs Barbara Clement / Alliecia Butler7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMegan Hua Shaul / Katrina Richards vs Brenda Jandebeur / Patricia Fleming6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Katrina Richards
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.41
Shelby Stahl
published
3.37
Lesley Quick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Alyson Sunden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Megan Hua Shaul
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Renee Ziemianski
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Staci Wittek
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
2.82
Denise Dexter
published 3
2.75
Nicole Love
published
2.63
Lee Steadman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Paula Abrams
published
Rachel Hallsten
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lesley Quick + Alyson Sunden5357% games+8.2% vs expected
Lesley Quick + Katrina Richards261258% games+2.8% vs expected
Lesley Quick + Megan Hua Shaul11065% games+1.2% vs expected
Alyson Sunden + Megan Hua Shaul8555% games−2.5% vs expected
Alyson Sunden + Katrina Richards7453% games−3.9% vs expected
Staci Wittek + Alyson Sunden3450% gamesnot enough data
Staci Wittek + Katrina Richards3445% gamesnot enough data
Staci Wittek + Lee Steadman4166% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katrina Richards
152W–79L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
3.43
Shelby Stahl
15W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Lesley Quick
83W–46L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Alyson Sunden
75W–60L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Megan Hua Shaul
57W–47L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Renee Ziemianski
16W–12L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Staci Wittek
99W–96L career · 9 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.15
3
Denise Dexter
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
Nicole Love
29W–23L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.75
3
Lee Steadman
33W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
2.63
Paula Abrams
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel Hallsten
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.