Teams

Temple Terrace Hawks - R. Warrener

2025 Hillsborough Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-16vs HCC SchneiderLost 01
L#3 DoublesPatrick Rairigh / Robert Chen vs Eugene Martineau / Ken Chin1-6, 2-6
2025-11-09vs HCC SchneiderLost 02
L#2 DoublesBrian Westmoreland / Patrick Rairigh vs Sylvain Gauthier / Jason Lee0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAlvin MacAsinag / Robert Chen vs Brian Stone / Ken Chin3-6, 1-6
2025-11-02vs Golden Pirates of HCC - F. RussianSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKyle Day / Patrick Rairigh vs Doug Clery / James Baker4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAlvin MacAsinag / Steven Jenkins vs Charles Constantine / Freddy Russian6-1, 6-1
2025-10-19vs HCC SchneiderLost 01
L#2 DoublesGary Zirbel / Robert Chen vs Jose Alomar / William Arfsten1-6, 4-6
2025-10-12vs Golden Pirates of HCC - F. RussianSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlvin MacAsinag / Kenneth Fonte vs David Voelker / Freddy Russian6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGary Zirbel / Robert Chen vs Goran Alimpic / James Baker6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlvin MacAsinag / Kenneth Fonte vs David Voelker / Freddy Russian7-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Ken Coulter
published
3.35
Brian Westmoreland
published 3.5
Alvin MacAsinag
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Steven Jenkins
published
3.18
Robert Chen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Patrick Rairigh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Marvin Jones
published
Michael Costanza
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Costanza + Patrick Rairigh12658% gamesnot enough data
Robert Chen + Alvin MacAsinag3448% gamesnot enough data
Robert Chen + Michael Costanza4155% gamesnot enough data
Michael Costanza + Steven Jenkins314 matchesnot enough data
Robert Chen + Patrick Rairigh213 matchesnot enough data
Michael Costanza + Marvin Jones213 matchesnot enough data
Marvin Jones + Alvin MacAsinag213 matchesnot enough data
Steven Jenkins + Brian Westmoreland123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ken Coulter
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Brian Westmoreland
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Alvin MacAsinag
53W–84L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven Jenkins
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Robert Chen
158W–87L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Patrick Rairigh
108W–103L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Marvin Jones
24W–31L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Costanza
129W–56L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.