Teams

EFSC - Leiter

2025 Brevard Adult 18 & Over Early Start · 3.0 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-09vs RCCB - AboudLost 01
L#1 DoublesBonita Madden / Julia Tulloch vs Diana Hayslip / Megan Holthaus1-6, 4-6
2024-11-18vs Rockledge Rebels - MullowneyWon 10
W#3 DoublesBeverly Gibbs / Allison Moorhead vs Angie Vorndran / Karen Kelly6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-11vs Kiwanis - FordWon 20
W#1 SinglesBeverly Gibbs vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJulia Tulloch / Petra Elliott vs Darlissa Salazar / Rory Egger6-3, 6-3
2024-11-04vs Suntree - FordSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBeverly Gibbs / Mary Failla vs Caroline Jiborn / Mandy Smith3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulia Tulloch / Bev Wilcocks vs Sharon Ford / Darien Lawrence5-7, 4-6
2024-10-28vs Fee - LuerWon 20
W#1 DoublesBeverly Gibbs / Meredith Christie vs Monika DeMari / Lauren Ranew6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulia Tulloch / Bev Wilcocks vs Renee Jiannine / Kristi Swor2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-27vs Kiwi - SalvatoreWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulia Tulloch / Bonita Madden vs Melanie McManus / Julianne Moore6-1, 6-1
2024-10-21vs Suntree - MikaLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulia Tulloch / Shelly Deater vs Josie Buxton / Stuart Buxton3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-10-14vs EFSC - TaylorWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulia Tulloch / Allison Moorhead vs Trisha Watson / Alicia Hanrahan6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Mary Failla
published
3.05
Bonita Madden
published 3
3.03
Beverly Gibbs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.98
Petra Elliott
published
2.95
Julia Tulloch
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.85
June Leiter
published
2.84
Shelly Deater
published
2.75
Allison Moorhead
published 3
Ginger Ballou
published 3
2.35
Bev Wilcocks
published 3
Meredith Christie
published
Tanishia Henderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Gibbs + Julia Tulloch6167% games+5.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Failla
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Bonita Madden
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Beverly Gibbs
74W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Petra Elliott
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Julia Tulloch
97W–101L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
June Leiter
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
2.85
Shelly Deater
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.84
3
Allison Moorhead
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Ginger Ballou
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Bev Wilcocks
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.35
Meredith Christie
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tanishia Henderson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.