Teams

CKuremsky/Whited NRCC

2022 Cap Spring USTA 18 & over · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-16vs CGraffWon 20
W#2 DoublesKathy Saieed / Jenna Dysart vs Heather Chapman / Jamie Hinckley6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesCelia Whited vs Tiffani Campbell6-1, 6-0
2022-05-02Won 10
W#2 SinglesJenna Dysart vs Elizabeth Thompson6-1, 6-1
2022-04-30vs CByrumWon 20
W#1 DoublesJenna Dysart / Cara Kuremsky vs Mary-Jo Caldwell / Debra Hauge6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKellie Chesson / Celia Whited vs Joy Cooper / Tracy Wild6-0, 6-0
2022-04-25vs JWOLBORSKY 3.0 (18)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCelia Whited / Cara Kuremsky vs Neepa Patel / Marie Gelston4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-04-04Won 10
W#1 SinglesCelia Whited vs Amy Clarke6-1, 6-2
2022-03-28vs LClarkSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKellie Chesson / Celia Whited vs Amanda Mueller / Julie Karg6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCara Kuremsky / Jenna Dysart vs Hope Graney / Julie Liddle6-4, 6-3
2022-03-21vs LVeit/BakerWon 10
W#2 SinglesJenna Dysart vs Julia Kerr4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-03-14vs KHuffstetlerWon 10
W#3 DoublesJenna Dysart / Cara Kuremsky vs Karen Rayda / Dawn Rusnak6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Celia Whited
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
Cristina Ennis
published 3.5
3.22
Jenna Dysart
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Cara Kuremsky
published 3.5
3.07
Kellie Chesson
published 3.5
2.99
Karen Wakeford
published
2.74
Jennifer Bissette
published
2.57
Haley Davies
published 3
2.54
Taylor Cheek
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kellie Chesson + Jenna Dysart6747% games+12.2% vs expected
Celia Whited + Kellie Chesson7356% gamesnot enough data
Celia Whited + Jenna Dysart213 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Bissette + Taylor Cheek213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Celia Whited
79W–80L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Cristina Ennis
0W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Jenna Dysart
98W–58L career · 12 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Cara Kuremsky
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Kellie Chesson
107W–119L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Karen Wakeford
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.99
Jennifer Bissette
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Haley Davies
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
2.57
Taylor Cheek
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.