Teams

Team 3 Summer Serve Aces

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.90 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-15vs Team 7Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRonald Oberbillig / Elango Rengasamy vs Mike Burgoyne / Jeff Rosenblum2-6, 2-6
2023-07-12vs Team 5 The WarriorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesSanjivan Sivapiragasam / Elango Rengasamy vs Sai Maddi / Chandra Shekhar Ramshetti7-5
2023-07-08vs Team 4 High VoltageSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElango Rengasamy / Ronald Oberbillig vs Murugavel Chengalvarayan / Senthil Kumar Seetharaman6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesClay Kirkendall / Sanjivan Sivapiragasam vs Alan Ogilvie / Manish Desai1-6, 5-7
2023-06-25vs Team 5 The WarriorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesSanjivan Sivapiragasam / Ronald Oberbillig vs Muthukrishnan Ganesan / Kyle Gustafson6-4, 2-3
2023-06-17vs Team 4 High VoltageWon 10
W#1 DoublesElango Rengasamy / Stephen Worrall vs Marc Short / Joong Min7-6, 4-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Elango Rengasamy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Douglas Choi
published 4
3.56
Stephen Worrall
published
3.51
Sanjivan Sivapiragasam
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Pedro Garcia
published
3.26
Yong Kim
published
Clay Kirkendall
published 3.5
Jonathan Slinkard
published
Ronald Oberbillig
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sanjivan Sivapiragasam + Elango Rengasamy4260% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elango Rengasamy
96W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Jacques Beaudry-Losique
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Douglas Choi
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
Stephen Worrall
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Sanjivan Sivapiragasam
86W–88L career · 3 lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.51
Pedro Garcia
27W–15L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.48
Yong Kim
5W–19L career · no lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
3.26
3.5
Clay Kirkendall
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jonathan Slinkard
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ronald Oberbillig
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.