Teams

Royal Poinciana -

2023 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-03-02vs Naples Lakes - PrendergastWon 10
W#2 DoublesLindsay Simmons / Caroline Rogers vs Patricia Wacker / Cindy Jannetty7-6, 6-4
2023-02-09vs Valencia Bonita - GredingerLost 01
L#2 DoublesCaroline Rogers / Catherine Kelly vs Lorraine Steuerer / Kate Gredinger4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-02-02vs Village Walk Bonita - LaggisWon 10
W#1 DoublesLindsay Simmons / Caroline Rogers vs Joan Ravens / Margaret Laggis6-0, 6-2
2023-01-26vs Lighthouse Bay - CoteLost 01
L#1 DoublesCaroline Rogers / Catherine Kelly vs Christiane Gauthier / Anna Lis3-6, 0-6
2023-01-19vs COLLIER / AmatoWon 10
W#1 DoublesLindsay Simmons / Caroline Rogers vs Dawn Amato / Dana Sacks7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Catherine Kelly
published 3.5
3.37
Caroline Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Deborah Tharpe
published 3.5
2.95
Christine Plant
published 3.5
2.71
Celeste Denton
published 3
Joan Roehr
published
Karen Broyhill
published
Karen Guenther
published
Katie Robertson
published
Laurie Theiss
published
Lindsay Simmons
published
Paula Whitelaw
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Simmons + Caroline Rogers303 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Theiss + Katie Robertson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catherine Kelly
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Caroline Rogers
149W–130L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Deborah Tharpe
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Christine Plant
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Celeste Denton
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
Joan Roehr
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Broyhill
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Guenther
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katie Robertson
6W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laurie Theiss
7W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lindsay Simmons
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paula Whitelaw
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.