Teams

BChandra (Charlotte Indoor)

2022 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Tues PM

9 players · average NTRP 3.64 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-03vs KMiller (Weddington)Won 10
W#1 DoublesBharath Chandra / Philip Durand vs Richard Gallagher / Richard Teat7-6, 6-2
2022-04-19vs RSankaran (Life Time)Split 11
W#1 DoublesCharles Bowers / Philip Durand vs Cameron Jones / Duane Johnson6-7, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKibbee Reese / Rohit Vohra vs Bharath Bhaskar / Bob Hofmann1-6, 2-6
2022-04-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPhilip Durand / Mike Drezek vs Dan Brantmeyer / Jason Freeman1-6, 4-6
2022-04-05vs DWatson (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesPhilip Durand / Kibbee Reese vs Michael Boyce / Kyle Johnson6-3, 6-3
2022-03-29vs KMiller (Weddington)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAdam Miller / Kibbee Reese vs Kevin Conway / George Pawlush3-6, 2-6
2022-03-22vs JMarks (Providence CC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPhilip Durand / Scott MacIntosh vs Alan DeKeukelaere / Brad Jancek1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKibbee Reese vs Jim Marks3-6, 3-6
2022-03-19vs TCastain/TYoung (Weddington)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAaron Borders / Kibbee Reese vs Scott Waldrop / Scott King2-6, 3-6
2022-02-22vs RSankaran (Life Time)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBharath Chandra / Kibbee Reese vs Zhen Zu / Bharath Bhaskar5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Philip Durand
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.72
Charles Bowers
published 4
3.41
Kibbee Reese
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
David Maloney
published 3.5
3.11
Scott MacIntosh
published
3.08
Erik Stokkebye
published 3.5
2.97
Gregory Vlahos
published 3.5
2.88
Aaron Borders
published 3.5
Clayton Kennedy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erik Stokkebye + Scott MacIntosh3248% gamesnot enough data
Philip Durand + Kibbee Reese2353% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Philip Durand
32W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Charles Bowers
34W–27L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Kibbee Reese
17W–41L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
David Maloney
3W–10L career · type S · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
Scott MacIntosh
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Erik Stokkebye
6W–17L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Gregory Vlahos
1W–11L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97
3.5
Aaron Borders
0W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
2.88
Clayton Kennedy
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.