Teams

HBSQ-Lohman

2022 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-03vs FC-TricaricoLost 03
L#1 DoublesChar Hogan / Charlotte Lohman vs Meeijane Jen / Pauline Anderson0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLora Pappas / Mary Fox vs Susan Tricarico / Sherrill Stone3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesShirley Havenga / Kaye Ostgard vs Jane Shively / Homa Assefi2-6, 0-6
2022-05-24vs HBSQ-Tierney/SmalleyLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichele Simmons / Sheila King vs Sara Kuhl / Susan Chase1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLUCILLE NOEL / Kaye Ostgard vs JR Thompson / Liz Smalley0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMary Fox / Carla Nichols vs Diane Wah / Pamela Steele1-6, 2-6
2022-05-09vs CP-Shot Sisters-EssingerLost 03
L#1 DoublesKimberle Brown / Sheila King vs Lili Chang / Elaine Loong1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCharlotte Lohman / Lora Pappas vs Lynn Vona / Leslie Fields6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSandy Boyle / Patricia Roberts vs Marilyn Pedersen / Priscilla Kloess0-6, 2-6
2022-05-05vs BETC-McClearyLost 03
L#1 DoublesSheila King / Kimberle Brown vs Ming Vuong / Mary Jo Leonardson6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesChar Hogan / Carla Nichols vs Ruthann Nelson / Della McCleary1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLUCILLE NOEL / Lora Pappas vs Sally Linebarger / Kristi Tiernan3-6, 1-6
2022-04-25vs AYTC-ArmstrongWon 21
L#1 DoublesChar Hogan / Michele Simmons vs Pamela Waldron / Ann Knight6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCharlotte Lohman / LUCILLE NOEL vs Frances Costigan / Nancy Danoff6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesFrancoise O'Donnell / Lora Pappas vs Susan Bussell / Kay Linger7-6, 6-1
2022-04-19vs TCSP-Super 65's-LullLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichele Simmons / Carla Nichols vs Noel Angell / Judith Rosas3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMary Fox / Lora Pappas vs Connie Ray / Dorothy Darrow6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesShirley Havenga / Kaye Ostgard vs Sandy Berlin / Christina Krashan1-6, 5-7
2022-04-13vs RBW-Howe NiceLost 03
L#1 DoublesSheila King / Char Hogan vs Debra Simmonds / Maren Gibson2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLUCILLE NOEL / Carla Nichols vs Cynthia Moller / Karen Sparks2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesFrancoise O'Donnell / Shirley Havenga vs Valarie Kaye / Holly Conley0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 6.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HBSQ-Tierney/Smalley702018128
2CP-Shot Sisters-Essinger5213818156
3RBW-Howe Nice4313818163
4BETC-McCleary43111020182
5FC-Tricarico43101122173
6TCSP-Super 65's-Lull3412921178
7HBSQ-Lohman1621938236
8AYTC-Armstrong0712041249

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.24 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.40
Sheila King
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Char Hogan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Charlotte Lohman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.08
Francoise O'Donnell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Carla Nichols
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Karen Gillespie
published
Kaye Ostgard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kimberle Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
LUCILLE NOEL
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Lora Pappas
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Mary Fox
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 0
Michele Simmons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sandy Boyle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shirley Havenga
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kaye Ostgard + Char Hogan0622% gamesnot enough data
Carla Nichols + Char Hogan044 matchesnot enough data
Karen Gillespie + Charlotte Lohman134 matchesnot enough data
Lora Pappas + Charlotte Lohman033 matchesnot enough data
LUCILLE NOEL + Charlotte Lohman303 matchesnot enough data
Kaye Ostgard + Shirley Havenga123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheila King
5W–15L career · 4 lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
2.40
2.5
Char Hogan
2W–23L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Charlotte Lohman
6W–15L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Francoise O'Donnell
25W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Carla Nichols
0W–14L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Gillespie
2W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kaye Ostgard
1W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kimberle Brown
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
LUCILLE NOEL
5W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lora Pappas
2W–14L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
0
Mary Fox
1W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michele Simmons
10W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandy Boyle
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Shirley Havenga
1W–9L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.