← Teams

SHC-Zielinski

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.86 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Nancy Garlock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
—
Shelly Perkins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Carrie Putsch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Catherine Crosby
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Mary Hlady
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.46
Nancy Korenek-Leveque
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Babette Zielinski
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Results5 ties
2020-03-08Lost 1–2
W#2 DoublesCynthia Perelli-Minetti / Catherine Crosby vs Karen Dellinger / Angie Urrutia4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNancy Korenek-Leveque vs Hong Jones6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNancy Garlock / Shelly Perkins vs Flor Harrigan / Takumi Koyama6-1, 6-3
2020-02-22Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesCynthia Perelli-Minetti / Shelly Perkins vs Carla Wheeler / Emiko Kogure6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJennifer Hill / Carrie Putsch vs Cathy Gatzke / Lily Looi6-4, 6-3
2020-01-12Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesCynthia Perelli-Minetti / Carrie Putsch vs Anne Fahlbusch / Kim Regalado6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNancy Korenek-Leveque / Elizabeth Layton vs Claire Thayer / Dalika Crawford6-1, 6-1
2020-01-04Lost 0–2
L#2 SinglesCatherine Crosby vs Kelly Mohr6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNancy Korenek-Leveque / Nancy Garlock vs Rie Sasakawa / Flor Harrigan6-2, 7-5
2019-12-14Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesHonorato Wenceslao / Nancy Korenek-Leveque vs Amanda Jensen / Wiley Zhao5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Nancy Garlock
29W–30L career · type A
not enough data
—
4
Shelly Perkins
16W–16L career
not enough data
—
4
Carrie Putsch
62W–49L career
2%98%0%
3.73
4
Catherine Crosby
67W–26L career
7%93%0%
3.67
4
Mary Hlady
99W–109L career
34%66%0%
3.50
3.5
Nancy Korenek-Leveque
76W–81L career · type A
0%89%11%
3.46
3.5
Babette Zielinski
52W–66L career
0%97%3%
3.33

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.