Teams

RFC:Love2U:Pease

2022 ME Adult 55 & Over Women · 7.0 55 & Over Women 1

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-12-18vs MP:SweetShots:TuttleLost 12
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Pease / Jill Craft vs Sandra Johnson / Patricia Summerer7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Coupe / Patricia Martel-Buxton vs Corinne Foley / Patricia Persson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathleen Gagne / Peggy Fallon-St.Thomas vs Deirdre Barton / Jane Tuttle6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2021-12-18vs RFC:MidcourtCrisis:WinfeldLost 12
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Pease / Jill Craft vs Liz Winfeld / Elizabeth Coates5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRuth Matt / Roma Bonnin vs Marion Bannon / Elizabeth Boucher1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJane Richards / Caroline Pratt vs Patricia Franson / Cynthia Loebenstein4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-12-04vs RFC:MoodSwings:EpsteinLost 12
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Pease / Roma Bonnin vs Martha Elbaum / Carol Epstein0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRuth Matt / Jodi Tucker vs Ellen Groleau / Julie Wooden7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKathleen Gagne / Linda Coupe vs Mary Becker / Rebecca Love2-6, 1-6
2021-12-04vs MP:SweetShots:TuttleWon 30
W#1 DoublesCharlotte Pease / Andrea Otis-Higgins vs Patricia Persson / Sarah Maxwell7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPatricia Martel-Buxton / Laurie Burger vs Sandra Johnson / Deirdre Barton7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCaroline Pratt / Jane Richards vs Jane Tuttle / Nancy Lemieux7-6, 6-2
2021-11-13vs RFC:MoodSwings:EpsteinLost 03
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Pease / Judy Sevigny vs Martha Elbaum / Carol Epstein3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRuth Matt / Jodi Tucker vs Gwen Lambert / Lori Thayer5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Otis-Higgins / Jane Richards vs Susan Steinman / Julie Wooden2-6, 2-6
2021-11-13vs MP:SweetShots:TuttleLost 12
W#1 DoublesCharlotte Pease / Joanne Chapman vs Sandra Johnson / Karen Robidoux6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJill Craft / Linda Coupe vs Corinne Foley / Patricia Persson2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRoma Bonnin / Andrea Otis-Higgins vs Nancy Lemieux / Jane Tuttle2-6, 2-6
2021-10-30vs RFC:MidcourtCrisis:WinfeldLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaurie Burger / Jodi Tucker vs Norann Oleson / Carol Lambert4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Coupe / Peggy Fallon-St.Thomas vs Holly Rich / Marion Bannon2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCaroline Pratt / Patricia Martel-Buxton vs Elizabeth Boucher / Deborah Cavanaugh2-6, 3-6
2021-10-17vs RFC:MoodSwings:EpsteinLost 02
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Pease / Laurie Burger vs Martha Elbaum / Lori Thayer6-0, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathleen Gagne / Andrea Otis-Higgins vs Gwen Lambert / Ellen Groleau1-6, 2-6
2021-10-17vs RFC:MidcourtCrisis:WinfeldLost 02
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Pease / Ruth Matt vs Liz Winfeld / Patricia Franson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRoma Bonnin / Andrea Otis-Higgins vs Holly Rich / Elizabeth Coates4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.0 55 & Over Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RFC:MoodSwings:Epstein8121614177
2RFC:MidcourtCrisis:Winfeld7221618219
3MP:SweetShots:Tuttle2752247303
4RFC:Love2U:Pease1872042294

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Ruth Matt
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.01
Jill Craft
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Patricia Martel-Buxton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Andrea Otis-Higgins
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.86
Jodi Tucker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Charlotte Pease
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Linda Coupe
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Caroline Pratt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jane Richards
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Joanne Chapman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Judy Sevigny
published
Kathleen Gagne
published
Laurie Burger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Peggy Fallon-St.Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roma Bonnin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Sylvia Leblanc
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Martel-Buxton + Andrea Otis-Higgins7362% games−0.2% vs expected
Laurie Burger + Jill Craft2637% gamesnot enough data
Joanne Chapman + Roma Bonnin1536% gamesnot enough data
Jill Craft + Charlotte Pease0532% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Martel-Buxton + Ruth Matt224 matchesnot enough data
Joanne Chapman + Charlotte Pease123 matchesnot enough data
Linda Coupe + Roma Bonnin123 matchesnot enough data
Linda Coupe + Charlotte Pease033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ruth Matt
51W–52L career · 4 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
Jill Craft
19W–70L career · 3 lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.01
Patricia Martel-Buxton
96W–87L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Andrea Otis-Higgins
141W–141L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
2.92
Jodi Tucker
35W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Charlotte Pease
35W–71L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
Linda Coupe
13W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
Caroline Pratt
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jane Richards
18W–32L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joanne Chapman
5W–21L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Judy Sevigny
16W–33L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen Gagne
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Laurie Burger
12W–18L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Peggy Fallon-St.Thomas
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Roma Bonnin
18W–41L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sylvia Leblanc
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.