Teams

HH50/Lindenberger/South Beach

Fall League 50 & Over - Beaufort Co. · Men's 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-12-03vs HH50/Thieneman/Long CoveWon 21
W#1 DoublesHudson Lindenberger / Zeno Hawkins vs Christopher Bisgard / William Odell6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDrew Seale / William Davison vs Mark Leventhal / Kevin Thieneman6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesThomas Moore / Keith Herreman vs Bob ONeil / Reggie Register0-6, 1-6
2024-11-05vs HH50/Thieneman/Long CoveLost 12
W#1 DoublesWilliam Davison / Tom Corpora vs Kevin Thieneman / Scott Adams4-6, 3-1
L#2 DoublesZeno Hawkins / Scott Kuylen vs Bob ONeil / Mark Leventhal7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHudson Lindenberger / Dante Mancini vs William Odell / Reggie Register2-6, 0-6
2024-10-15vs HH50/Thieneman/Long CoveWon 21
W#1 DoublesWilliam McNeill / Tom Corpora vs Mark Leventhal / Mark McDermott6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKeith Herreman / Drew Seale vs Bob ONeil / Kevin Thieneman1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDOUGLAS CALAHAN / Thomas Moore vs Raymond Mitro / Reggie Register7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
DOUGLAS CALAHAN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Steve Helgeson
published
2.76
Drew Seale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Hudson Lindenberger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.68
Keith Herreman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.50
Dante Mancini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Scott Kuylen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Lewis
published
Tom Corpora
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

DOUGLAS CALAHAN + Keith Herreman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
DOUGLAS CALAHAN
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
Steve Helgeson
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
2.84
3.5
Drew Seale
20W–15L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
2.76
3
Hudson Lindenberger
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Keith Herreman
4W–14L career · 2 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Dante Mancini
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50
Scott Kuylen
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Scott Lewis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tom Corpora
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.