Teams

Ja.Hull18C

2026 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 9.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-16vs Ma.Treires18CWon 20
W#2 DoublesGrant McGrew / Mike Trefzger vs Kwame Owens / James Treires6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Schroeder / Wes Watson vs Mark Treires / Drew Slocum6-1, 7-5
2026-08-09vs Ma.Treires18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesGrant McGrew / Andrew Dinicola vs Evan Wharton / J Wilbur Dotson5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesWes Watson / Thomas Hughes vs Mark Treires / Ryan Bernthal4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.42 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.81
4.78
Grant McGrew
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.47
Jason Hull
published
4.44
Andrew Dinicola
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.29
Rayan Jabr
published
4.28
Mike Trefzger
published
4.28
Vance Jennings
published 4.5
4.26
Wes Watson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Emmanuel Oye
published 4.5
Jeffrey Schroeder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vance Jennings + Grant McGrew4645% gamesnot enough data
Grant McGrew + Wes Watson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Joshua Franceschina
80W–41L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.81
5
Grant McGrew
92W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.78
Jason Hull
9W–13L career · no lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
4.47
4.5
Andrew Dinicola
46W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
4.44
Rayan Jabr
10W–8L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
4.29
Mike Trefzger
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Vance Jennings
106W–79L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Wes Watson
154W–128L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
4.26
4.5
Emmanuel Oye
5W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.17
Jeffrey Schroeder
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.