Teams

Team 6 Love & Deuces 3.0

2026 NOVA Adult 40 & Over · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.80 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-23vs Team 9 Volley GirlsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCheryl Arnold / Ella Walchli vs Cecilia Marincioni / Melanie Bielski6-3, 4-2
W#1 SinglesFreda Moore vs Karen Gibian6-4, 4-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Poplawski / Mary de Dios vs Shaama Pandya / Sue Sujansky0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristina White / Denise Guthrie vs Cambra Donelson / Lara Correia Cherem6-7
W#1 DoublesIngrid Hunsicker / Christine Hines vs Jihan Bahhur / Tammy White6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMary de Dios vs Krista Vita6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCheryl Arnold / Ella Walchli vs Amy Heuer / Nichole Jimenez6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDenise Guthrie / Amber Wooten vs Heather Hall / April Cullen6-1, 6-3
2026-07-07vs Team 3 Court QueensWon 31
W#1 DoublesFreda Moore / Ingrid Hunsicker vs Sonal Jagasia / Deborah Wright6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMary de Dios vs Kamala Ismayilova6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Poplawski / Christine Hines vs Jenny Oum / Isabel Moore6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJenny Song / Denise Guthrie vs Teri McCarthy / Pooja Singh4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-06-28vs Team 5 Pop, Fizz, Ace!Won 31
W#1 DoublesFreda Moore / Ingrid Hunsicker vs Mary Miossi / Jacquelyn McVey6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesChristine Hines vs MB Banagan6-1, 5-2
L#2 DoublesMeghan Ringelberg / Christina White vs Jordana Fein / Erica Carter2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAdaisha Kemp / Elizabeth Poplawski vs Kristy Creagh / Allison Hamilton6-1, 5-2
2026-06-23vs Team 7 Simply SmashingSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAdaisha Kemp / Amber Wooten vs April Oh Hong / Kelley Schaufelberger0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Laura Johnson4-6, 4-5
W#2 DoublesMeghan Ringelberg / Christine Hines vs Sara Dunton / Donna Shaw4-6, 3-5
W#3 DoublesJenny Song / Elizabeth Poplawski vs Lois Frieman / Julie King6-7, 1-1
2026-06-17vs Team 8 Lucky Spin 3.0 SummerLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristina White / Freda Moore vs Tapleigh Niethamer / Cindy Weinberg4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Hines / Mary de Dios vs Pauline Tsai / Karen Jin5-7, 1-1
L#3 DoublesMeghan Ringelberg / Jenny Song vs Johanne Maher / Bernadett Damico6-4, 0-5
2026-06-09vs Team 13 Causing a Racquet 3.0Split 22
L#1 DoublesCheryl Arnold / Adaisha Kemp vs Jennifer Kroll / JEANETTE SARAIVA2-6, 5-2
W#1 SinglesMary de Dios vs Lynnita Montague-Daddio6-1, 4-5
L#2 DoublesChristine Hines / Amber Wooten vs Christy Bixler / Stephanie Place1-6, 4-4
W#3 DoublesJenny Song / Meghan Ringelberg vs Sarah Icore / Amy Kemon6-4, 3-3
2026-06-04vs Team 14 WGCC Slice GirlsLost 04
L#1 DoublesAdaisha Kemp / Ingrid Hunsicker vs Erica Bailey / Greta Kohlhagen6-7, 2-2
L#1 SinglesChristine Hines vs Susie Luongo4-6, 2-3
L#2 DoublesAmber Wooten / Jane Kim vs Brooke Daniels / Maureen Petron0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristina White / Meghan Ringelberg vs Erin Parker / Sejal Shah5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team 8 Lucky Spin 3.0 Summer8026613170
2Team 13 Causing a Racquet 3.08025716204
3Team 9 Volley Girls62181431237
4Team 5 Pop, Fizz, Ace!62171531253
5Team 7 Simply Smashing5116814150
6Team 2 Barnett Slice Girls53201225212
7Team 11 Loosely Strung53221027228
8Team 14 WGCC Slice Girls43141427230
9Team 15 ANCC Slice Girls44141837249
10Team 12 Tennisity34141428229
11Team 6 Love & Deuces 3.035161631246
12Team 4 Lovely Aces26112143302
13Team 10 ANCC Serving Shade2682446288
14Team 3 Court Queens16111736261
15Team 17 Vienna Vixens - Summer 3.01662246295
16Team 16 Rapid Fire17151735282
17Team 1 Double Trouble0632140257

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Freda Moore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.95
Christine Hines
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.85
Ingrid Hunsicker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Cheryl Arnold
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.76
Elizabeth Poplawski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.68
Ella Walchli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Mary de Dios
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.59
Meghan Ringelberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.54
Jenny Song
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Adaisha Kemp
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.28
Denise Guthrie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.27
Christina White
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.19
Amber Wooten
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ingrid Hunsicker + Cheryl Arnold3542% games+1.0% vs expected
Freda Moore + Ingrid Hunsicker213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Freda Moore
36W–37L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Christine Hines
22W–19L career · type A · 12 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Ingrid Hunsicker
113W–175L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Cheryl Arnold
11W–25L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Elizabeth Poplawski
3W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Ella Walchli
12W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
Mary de Dios
4W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
2.66
Meghan Ringelberg
7W–11L career · 8 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.59
Jenny Song
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
2.5
Adaisha Kemp
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
2.5
Denise Guthrie
20W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.28
2.5
Christina White
4W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Amber Wooten
13W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.