Teams

B2 KRA Czlackers

2023 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 6.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Emily Gravitt
published 4
3.87
Jacob Lenz
published 4
3.62
Melanie Spears
published
3.52
Katie Intihar
published
3.46
3.44
Creighton Anders
published 3.5
3.42
Zach Daniel
published
3.40
Ward Hackett
published
3.38
Casey Hill
published 3.5
3.33
Katherine Czyszczon
published
3.10
Sarah Hobgood
published
3.04
Sule Sauvigne
published
3.02
Kristopher Johnson
published
2.99
Elliott Gravitt
published 3.5
2.93
Beverly Clary
published 3
2.91
Lindsay Daniel
published
2.77
Heather DeBolt
published 3
Jon Czyszczon
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Gravitt
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Jacob Lenz
30W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.87
Melanie Spears
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.62
Katie Intihar
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Anne Stewart Blaylock
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Creighton Anders
30W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
Zach Daniel
13W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
Ward Hackett
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Casey Hill
19W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.38
Katherine Czyszczon
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
3.33
Sarah Hobgood
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Sule Sauvigne
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
Kristopher Johnson
17W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.02
3.5
Elliott Gravitt
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Beverly Clary
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
2.93
Lindsay Daniel
29W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
2.91
3
Heather DeBolt
24W–32L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
Jon Czyszczon
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.