Teams

Darling

2023 Neb. Mixed 40&Over · 6.0 Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 3.31 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-02-17vs NE/Erwin/Kephart/40&OverMXD6.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Finnegan / David Crotzer vs Andy Wang / Rachel O'Malley3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJackie Conway / Arnie Ovalles vs LiQin Kephart / Brian Liu6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAaron Bush / Christine Kozal vs Brandi Goldapp / Alexander Adkins2-6, 0-6
2023-02-10vs NE/Erwin/Kephart/40&OverMXD6.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAaron Bush / Christine Kozal vs Richard Shaw / Erin Foley0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesArun Agarwal / Jackie Conway vs Sarah Konigsberg / Brian Liu6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKyle Darling / Sarah Ramirez vs Ryan Wills / Melissa Hass1-6, 0-6
2023-02-03vs NE/Erwin/Kephart/40&OverMXD6.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesRoss Nesbitt / Kate Bush vs Jennifer Christensen / Ryan Wills6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDon Suh / Gina Alati vs Andy Wang / Sarah Konigsberg6-2, 6-3
2023-01-27vs NE/Erwin/Kephart/40&OverMXD6.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Crotzer / Mary Finnegan vs Andy Wang / LiQin Kephart2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesArnie Ovalles / Jackie Conway vs Ryan Wills / Melissa Hass0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKyle Darling / Sarah Ramirez vs Alexander Adkins / Jennifer Christensen6-2, 6-4
2023-01-20vs NE/Erwin/Kephart/40&OverMXD6.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesArun Agarwal / Christine Kozal vs Chad Redding / Brandi Goldapp6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesArnie Ovalles / Sarah Ramirez vs Richard Shaw / Erin Foley6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDon Suh / Heather Siebken vs Adrian Blake / Jennifer Christensen5-7, 5-7
2023-01-13vs NE/Erwin/Kephart/40&OverMXD6.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Crotzer / Mary Finnegan vs Richard Shaw / Erin Foley2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesDon Suh / Christine Kozal vs Alexander Adkins / Rachel O'Malley6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKyle Darling / Sarah Ramirez vs Ryan Wills / Melissa Hass2-6, 1-6
2023-01-06vs NE/Erwin/Kephart/40&OverMXD6.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAaron Bush / Sarah Ramirez vs Chad Redding / Brandi Goldapp2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKyle Darling / Jackie Conway vs Andy Wang / Jennifer Christensen0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRoss Nesbitt / Kate Bush vs Adrian Blake / LiQin Kephart3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NE/Erwin/Kephart/40&OverMXD6.06115616138
2Darling1661532212

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Melissa Darling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Heather Siebken
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.37
Jackie Conway
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
David Crotzer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Arun Agarwal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Gina Alati
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.89
Don Suh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Christine Kozal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Arnie Ovalles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Aaron Bush
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kate Bush
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kyle Darling
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Mary Finnegan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ross Nesbitt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Bush + Aaron Bush4152% gamesnot enough data
Jackie Conway + Arnie Ovalles314 matchesnot enough data
David Crotzer + Mary Finnegan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Darling
31W–33L career · 1 line in 2023
25%75%<1%
4.09
4
Heather Siebken
72W–72L career · 4 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.58
3.5
Jackie Conway
41W–24L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
David Crotzer
24W–43L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Arun Agarwal
7W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Gina Alati
43W–56L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Don Suh
3W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
2.89
3
Christine Kozal
19W–35L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Arnie Ovalles
5W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Aaron Bush
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kate Bush
36W–41L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kyle Darling
7W–18L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Finnegan
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ross Nesbitt
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.