Teams

WI Combo 7.5W (Day) GML Lake Country WAC Abhold

2026 WI Combo 7.5 Daytime · WI Combo 7.5 Women (Day)

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-31vs WI Combo 7.5W (Day) GML PVTC LamboLost 12
L#1 DoublesJean Muench / Karen Beaumont vs Karen Schmidt / Mary E Timm3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSarah Deppisch / Sarah Griffin vs Michelle Gruber / Janet Ericson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMicky Abhold / Jennifer McCausland vs Yvette Roller / Barb Seidl6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesSarah Deppisch / Sarah Griffin vs Melissa Hartwig / Sarah Augustson1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMicky Abhold / Terri Martin vs Joyce Koker / Susan Schmidt6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Beaumont / Jennifer McCausland vs Danielle Winchell / Kristina Mccullough2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WI Combo 7.5 Women (Day)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Combo 7.5W (Day) GML PVTC Lambo000000
2WI Combo 7.5W (Day) GML Lake Country WAC Abhold000000
3WI Combo 7.5W (Day) GML FLAC Winchell000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Jennifer McCausland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Jean Muench
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Sarah Griffin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Sarah Deppisch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Micky Abhold
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Karen Beaumont
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Terri Martin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Griffin + Sarah Deppisch23757% games+13.1% vs expected
Jennifer McCausland + Micky Abhold5842% games+0.1% vs expected
Micky Abhold + Jean Muench224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jennifer McCausland
39W–62L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
3.59
Jean Muench
64W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
Sarah Griffin
110W–61L career · 2 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.50
3.5
Sarah Deppisch
104W–74L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Micky Abhold
66W–103L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.33
Karen Beaumont
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Terri Martin
6W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.