← Teams

LOTC-Mounts/Rich

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Jaime Aranda-Michel
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.09
Mark Beilstein
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.08
Andy Griggs
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
2.99
John Brady
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.90
Michael Rich
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.90
Monte Gonzales
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.87
Jim Mounts
published 3
2.79
Jeff Mcdougald
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
David Lomartire
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Results9 ties
2024-11-30Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesAndy Griggs / Monte Gonzales vs Doug Denney / Dave Gillard6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJohn Brady / Michael Rich vs Patrick Priest / Kerry Sweet6-1, 6-1
2024-11-17Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMonte Gonzales / John Brady vs Frank Brown / Jeff Sunshine6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMark Beilstein / Michael Rich vs Gregory Foster / Robert Piercy6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAndy Griggs / David Lomartire vs Mister Archedon / Ken Bolton6-2, 6-2
2024-11-12Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesAndy Griggs / Mark Beilstein vs Norman Langston / Keith Westrum6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJaime Aranda-Michel / Jim Mounts vs Douglas Bennett / Masafumi Inoue6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMichael Rich / David Williams vs Dale Christensen / George Scott6-4, 6-4
2024-11-03Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJohn Brady / Monte Gonzales vs Bryan LaMontagne / Bryan Potter6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Rich / Jaime Aranda-Michel vs Doug Cooke / Rich Brown6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMark Beilstein / Jim Mounts vs Eugene Avery / Christopher Thomas2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-10-25Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesDavid Lomartire / John Brady vs Claude Bosworth / Andrew Smith7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJeff Mcdougald / Michael Rich vs Fred Buller / James Thomas6-3, 6-3
2024-10-06Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesMonte Gonzales / Andy Griggs vs Paul Garrahan / Eric Sowle6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMark Beilstein / David Williams vs David Graham / Anthony Yazzolino7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJaime Aranda-Michel / Michael Rich vs Brian Hefele / Kip Stevenson6-1, 6-1
2024-09-29Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesAndy Griggs / David Lomartire vs Dave Sasaki / Ed de la Fuente6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJeff Mcdougald / Mark Beilstein vs Lars Kasch / Kenneth Carter6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJaime Aranda-Michel / Michael Rich vs Jeremy Geschwind / Gus Johnson6-4, 7-5
2024-09-20Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesAndy Griggs / David Lomartire vs DeWayne Ledbetter / Scott Dickinson6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichael Rich / Jaime Aranda-Michel vs Manoj Agnihotri / Mitchell Todd6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJeff Mcdougald / Jim Mounts vs Jonathan Guinn / Dave Hardman6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-08Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesDavid Lomartire / Andy Griggs vs Mike Olson / Patrick Rhea7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jaime Aranda-Michel
48W–17L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Mark Beilstein
56W–38L career
13%87%0%
3.09
3.5
Andy Griggs
11W–13L career
21%79%0%
3.08
3
John Brady
71W–76L career
0%84%16%
2.99
3
Michael Rich
45W–77L career
0%95%5%
2.90
3
Monte Gonzales
118W–98L career
0%96%4%
2.90
3
Jim Mounts
59W–65L career
0%96%4%
2.87
3
Jeff Mcdougald
19W–16L career
1%98%1%
2.79
3
David Lomartire
21W–28L career
0%99%1%
2.78

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.