Teams

Team 9 Cross

2025 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-02-20vs Team 2 District AcesWon 30
W#1 DoublesWilliam Hancock / Joe Napolitano vs Daniel Laursen / Carlos Raul Jimenez5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Sherner / Byron Pickard vs Robert Wagoner / Jeremy Symons6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMark Murphy / Oron Strauss vs Alex Freiman / Jerr Davitch6-2, 6-3
2025-02-01vs Team 8 WGCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Murphy / John Sherner vs Michael Petron / Scott Ogorman1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBryant Springer / Oron Strauss vs Robert Whitney / Matt Carlson2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesScott Border / Biggs Cannon vs Christopher Crowder / Brett Loper6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-01-13vs Team 10 Serve AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoe Napolitano / Biggs Cannon vs Jeffrey Gill / John Murray6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBryant Springer / Scott Border vs Kevin Conaway / Jake Jacoby3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Sherner / David Cross vs Nabil Ghadiali / Paul Tourbaf6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Joe Napolitano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Benjamin Kringer
published 3.5
3.28
John Sherner
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Oron Strauss
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Biggs Cannon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Bryant Springer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Byron Pickard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
David Cross
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Scott Border
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Robert Easton
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joe Napolitano
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
3.5
Benjamin Kringer
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
John Sherner
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Oron Strauss
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Biggs Cannon
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Bryant Springer
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Byron Pickard
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
David Cross
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Scott Border
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Robert Easton
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.